Juan Becerra Acosta: Likes by votes at Cuauhtémoc

R

Eza the former proverb: Who takes care of Viper, from his ponzoña is poisonedto warn who listens to it, based on common sense, to recommend through experience about the risks of committing a certain behavior. In this case, to take care of a viper, Vijaña in whose nature is the biting to spread his poison even who cared for it.

The “politicians Influencers“They have found through virtuality a showcase to be seen and reaffirmed by millions. Let’s not confuse, the influencer You have the reason to obtain Likes and impressions; With this monetizes and believes that he reaffirms his worth; He is not interested in communicating, either expressing himself; If he does it is because he is obliged to do so, because it is the conduit to achieve the notoriety that feeds his portfolio and ego.

He does not call the construction of ideas, either to reasoning, except creation, for the influencer It is simply content that, according to the SAR, means thing that is contained within another. That is: it is what he uses to fill publications with the sole objective of generating attention, not to contribute anything to anyone but him.

Philanthropy and selfishness are opposite concepts until the influencer With your camera and microphone to monetize either the delivery of pizzas, clothing, money or anything else, to people in vulnerability. Pure selfishness that uses opportunism to build the false perception of seeking the well -being of others, when the only concern there is that of I nfluencer by himself.

Would you vote for someone like that for a public office? Will the governance of your community trust an I nfluencer? If, would I be confusing the suffrage with the Like?

It is not the same to deposit a vote in the urn, and with it the confidence for the performance of a political commission, than to oppress the button of heart In a publication in social networks to manifest sympathy for a person or occurrence. Confusing the above causes disasters.

When a influencer The voter arrives at a public office obtains a ruler who is looking for Likes and impressions, notoriety then. It does not generate programs, but content; If bump is not because it see the deterioration of asphalt as a problem, but as an opportunity to make a history. He puts his personal success to the social responsibility he acquired with the order.

Be in the public discussion, generate controversy, obtain impressions, Likescomments; Cause such a uproot that radio and television programs look for an interview and with it win presence in media, Win picture They tell him. That is what the influencerwho, when he has a public office, can use it to the detriment of society for five minutes – or those of notoriety.

To show, of many, the absurd and even illegal withdrawal from the monument Meeting With the sculptures of Fidel Castro and Ernesto Che Tobacco garden guevara by order of the influencerand mayor of Cuauhtémoc, Alessandra Rojo de la Vega.

Absurd, the only intention of that retirement is just what caused: notoriety. Illegal, as President Claudia Sheinbaum said at the people’s conference on Monday, July 21: You cannot remove a statue, a monument, so nothing more because yes. You have to go through a committee.

In 1955, asylums in Mexico, Fidel Castro and the Che Guevara began not only their friendship in the Tabacalera neighborhood, but also agreed to fight for the overthrow of Fulgencio Batista and in favor of the Cuban Revolution. Beyond the ideologies, philias and phobias, the Cuban revolution impacted the politics and ideology of the planet. Removing the sculpture, in addition to illegal, is dark.

But the objective was met, and the content He went viral and occupied the conversation for days: discussion tables, interviews, statements, this writing and even space at the people’s conference obtained. And how not? The severity of the withdrawal of the sculpture and what this implies merits that and more.

There you have an example of how the personal success of the “politician influencer“It puts your social responsibility before. That happens when like with the vote is confused, it causes a serious problem because a influencer It does not have a regulated ethical system, as a public official has it to which to serve the people care more than use it to exalt their public image.