February 15, 2023, 11:30 PM
February 15, 2023, 11:30 PM
The Vice President of the State, David Choquehuanca, rescheduled the interpellation this Wednesday in which he was to appear this day before the Plurinational Legislative Assembly (ALP) the Minister of Government, Eduardo Del Castillodue to the siege of social organizations and police repression of the department of Santa Cruz during the strike for the Population and Housing Census.
The unusual thing is that the reprogramming by the born president of the ALP was set for October 11, 2023almost a year after the events that occurred in the department of Santa Cruz.
“The Vice Ministry of Government Coordination and Management sent the ALP presidency the justifications of force majeure that would make it impossible for the Minister of Government (Eduardo Del Castillo) to attend the interpellatory act,” points to the missive.
The document claims that rescheduling of the inquiry It occurred because the head of the Government will travel to Argentina between “February 13 to 16 to attend to State issues.”
The deputy for the Citizen Community (CC), María José Salazar, questioned that the suspension has been given without prior noticesince they received the response from Choquehuanca around 11:30, when the interpellation was to be installed at 2:00 p.m.
“We see another attempt by the MAS to protect Eduardo del Castillo and prevent it from being accountable to the country,” Salazar said through his social networks.
rated as Contradictory statement from the Vice Presidency and to postpone the interpellation until October, almost at the end of the legislative period. He recalled that if the interpellation is suspended in the first instance, it must be dealt with in the next session.
“My response to the misleading statement from the State Vice Presidency. They are not going to call me a liar. I hope so, your prompt response on the warning regarding art. 145 of the regulation, if not, they are confirming that there is political protection and evasion of their responsibilities”, asserted the parliamentarian.
He also questioned that in the presentation of the note by Del Castillo, on February 13, Attached is an internal communication dated February 14.