Fernando Ugasformer lawyer of the businesswoman Karelim López and the former secretary general of the Government Palace, Bruno Pachecowould be involved in the falsification of a document against former attorney Daniel Soria.
According to a report issued by Punto Final this Sunday, April 24, Fernando Ugaz sent an official letter to Aníbal Torres, then head of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights (Minjusdh)stating that daniel soria “did not meet the requirements for the position” state attorney general.
“I inform about the criminal and irregular conduct of the Attorney General of the State, Daniel Soria”refers to the subject of the document sent to Aníbal Torres on November 9, 2021, to which Punto Final had access.
YOU CAN SEE: From the Congress, PL is preparing to cut the presidential mandate, says Juárez
Likewise, the Sunday newspaper specifies that said complaint against Daniel Soria stressed that “he lacked knowledge and experience in the State”an argument that was used by the government to dismiss him last February.
On the other hand, Milena Antón, a member of the Ugaz & Zegarra law firm of lawyer Fernando Ugaz, denounced that both his signature and the stamp with his name were falsified in order to deliver the document against Soria.
In addition, the lawyer said that “he never sent the official letter.”
“The fact that they have used my signature, my name, there is a subject that I did not even know,” Antón said in communication with Fernando Ugaz, who could not explain the complaint made by the lawyer.
YOU CAN SEE: Mayor of SJM would have celebrated his birthday with a party of almost S / 70,000
“Excuse me, Milena. You want to talk about that signing thing over the phone? We have talked in person, but you keep talking on the phone,” replied Ugaz.
On the other hand, the sixth Corporate Criminal Prosecutor’s Office of Lima opened an investigation in this regard for the alleged crime of generic falsehood. In said complaint, Milena Antón appears as injured in the case.
“I am not the author of said document, Moreover, I do not know the document”, specified the lawyer. She reiterated having been a victim of forgery in her own workplace.
