Today: November 14, 2024
February 23, 2023
2 mins read

Farid Kahhat: "I don’t know what Pedro Castillo’s lawyers are thinking"

Interview. Professor of the Diplomatic Academy of Peru removed doubts about the request for restitution and release from the former president to the IACHR.

It is not the first time that the former president Pedro Castillo resort to international bodies. Still as head of state, he invoked the Democratic Charter of the Organization of American States (OAS), but breached recommendations of the High-Level Mission despite the fact that the preliminary report mentioned the “destabilizing attacks” received by his administration. The continuation of the coup with the failed coup was an authoritarian measure alien to the values ​​of humanitarian law and respect for democratic institutions.

A day later, on December 8, 2022, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) issued an emphatic statement. He condemned “the decisions contrary to the constitutional order in Peru”, while recognizing “the immediate actions of the institutions of Peru in defense of democracy to avoid the realization of the institutional breakdown.” It is because of this background that the internationalist Farid Kahhat does not envision any support from the IACHR for Castillo Terrones in his request for release and restitution. “I don’t know what their lawyers are thinking,” he said in conversation with this means of communication.

Statement of the IACHR on the unconstitutional claim of the former Peruvian head of State.  Photo: screenshot/IACHR

Statement of the IACHR on the unconstitutional claim of the former Peruvian head of State. Photo: screenshot/IACHR

The commission does not act ex officio; that is to say, it does not have immediate interference in the cases denounced before its jurisdiction. In addition, the recommendations it provides —for example, those listed by the High Level Mission at the request of the former rural school teacher— are not mandatory. It cannot have determination in the action of its Member States, except in flagrant breach of its articles. The maximum coercive measure is to take away the right to vote from the member countries, but Peru, in the case of the removal of the recent former president, complies with the regulations. “The IACHR may criticize the conduct of the Government of Dina Boluarte in matters of human rightsbut I don’t think it will help Castillo at all”, commented the internationalist.

False statements of the Government of Dina Boluarte about Castillo’s claims

The prime minister who accumulates more than half a hundred deaths From his entrance to the Palace he made a bet. Pedro Castillo would like to emulate the current president of Colombia, Gustavo Petroin his past “replacement” as mayor of Bogotá in 2014. In dialogue with Radio Programas, Alberto Otárola He outlined that possibility, but Kahhat does not believe there is a parallel: “What is attributed to the former head of state is more serious and, in addition, he was arrested in flagrante.”

Almost nine years ago Petro appealed to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for their political rights to be returned. Only then was she able to register for the presidential elections. The ex-unionist’s approach is different, since the request made by his ex-minister Walter Ayala It is to another entity, the IACHR.

Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

Raquel Peña y ministro Bonilla entregan 260 nuevos apartamentos en “Mi Vivienda Ciudad Modelo”
Previous Story

Raquel Peña and Minister Bonilla deliver 260 new apartments in “Mi Vivienda Ciudad Modelo”

Next Story

A ‘hat-trick’ from Di María gives Juve the classification

Latest from Blog

Go toTop