He Exagum General of the Republic Jean Alain Rodríguez insists that the court order another court To know the judgment in the background against him for the accusation of corruption made by the Public Ministry.
The defense Rodríguez summoned for Wednesday, at 11:00 in the morning, where, he says, he will show “the serious offenses incurred” by the Judges of the Fourth Collegiate Court of the National DistrictKeyla Pérez Santana, Elías Santini Perera and Arisleyda Méndez Bautista “, which is in charge of knowing the case file Medusa operationheaded by the former official along with 14 other accused who were sent to Fund judgment.
The Lawyers Carlos Balcácer, Gustavo Biaggi and Nelys Rivas challenged the magistrates to be partialized and claim that the court which integrate was “irregularly assigned and without random raffle.”
It is remembered that at the time of deciding the “assignment direct “of the room Court Collegiate, in August of last year, the judge acting in functions of the Criminal Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the National District, Claribel Nivar Arias, argued in the 503-2024-TAUT-01578 car, which “according to the procedure designed” by That presidency was selected that way because it was “the only court that does not have so far with cases of this type (complex cases and for the time that entails their knowledge).
The legal defenders of Jean Alain Rodríguez They also claim that “from the beginning” of the process have “promoted the participation of the press in the hearings with the objective that the truth prevails “, but that the Judges of the room Court Collegiate, which challenged last week, “without any of the defenses to have requested it, the members of the press of the audience hall, prohibiting cameras and recorders “.
- “In view of said restriction to the press and that we were not allowed to present the challenge orally and publicly, as ordered by the law to these JudgesWe reiterate the importance of its presence (the press) In this wheel of presswhere they can know firsthand and with total transparency The evidence that supports our request to change court“, say the Lawyers.
They called the Court Appeal of the National District order a change of court to another, “composed of Judges impartialthat can objectively examine the vices of the process and all the evidence. “
