“Although it is current law, it cannot be used for cases presented in the framework of the Coahuila election, since the reform violates the 90-day rule to be applied in an electoral process, contained in article 105 of the Constitution” , said magistrate Luis Espíndola Morales.
This decision is made in the framework of the complaint presented by the party of the Democratic Revolution and the coordinator of Movimiento Ciudadano in the Chamber of Deputies, Jorge Alvarez Máynez, after the massive act that Morena carried out in Coahuila, where they were present. the candidates for governorship for that entity and the so-called “corcholatas” for 2024.
He clarified that the reform cannot be applied in the federal process of 2024 either, given that the Superior Chamber of the TEPJF has already ruled on the matter, in matters of government propaganda, in March 2022 when the decree of authentic interpretation of the concept of identity was declared inapplicable. “government propaganda”, within the mandate revocation procedure.
That decree allowed public officials to make government propaganda without being sanctioned by the electoral authority, while the changes to the Social Communication Law, that President Andrés Manuel López Obrador could continue with his morning conferences, from where disseminate government achievements.
The point of analysis and the reform occurred after in March 2022, the legislators of Morena, PT and El Verde regulated government propaganda, through an “interpretation” decree in which they considered that the “expressions” of servers public are not propaganda and, therefore, the electoral campaign ban of the revocation process that was being carried out at that time did not apply to them.
Subsequently, the decree was pointed out as contrary to the Constitution.
