Eduardo Ponce Vivanco criticizes the lukewarmness with which the government of Dina Boluarte deals with the interference of the former president of bolivian, Evo Moralesand his attempt to want to separate the south of our country.
What do you think of Boluarte’s reaction to Evo?
Evo Morales is a person who has no other condition than that of being an agitator and a person committed to nefarious acts in the south of the country. Therefore, these subversive interferences should be answered with an absolute ban on his entry into the national territory. And if he dared to try to enter through our borders, he should be subject to immediate detention or expulsion by immigration from our country.
LOOK: Jorge Montoya denounces Evo Morales and Vladimir Cerrón for treason
Congressman Montoya has denounced Evo Morales and Vladimir Cerrón for violating national security and treason.
What corresponds to Peru to do is to reject its presence drastically.
Evo Morales describes the rejection of his person as attacks that come from the right. What does he think?
What should be done in serious terms is for the Foreign Ministry to protest vigorously in front of the Bolivian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. You have to put it in its place.
Why did Evo Morales choose Peru?
Morales is historically envious of Peru because he has always wanted to be the leader of the Parandinos (a movement that seeks the unification of all the Andean peoples) and he knows well that Peru has a place in that sense. That is why when he called a meeting of Runasur he did it in Cusco because it is the capital of the Inca state. For what Evo wants to subdue the south and turn it into a land where he is heard, that is something that we cannot and must not allow. He is behaving like a ridiculous character with pretensions that are far beyond his capabilities.
RECOMMENDED VIDEOS:
:quality(75)/cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/fA2b4vAf/poster.jpg "Eduardo Ponce on interference by Evo Morales: \"The Foreign Ministry should protest before Bolivia\"")
