The President Dina Boluarte It presents a financial unbalance of more than 50,000 soles, according to one of the expert reports carried out in the preliminary investigation against it. The expert report, prepared by Richard Daniel Sánchez Solórzano and Margalinda Salinas Moncadadetermined that the president has an increase in her assets of 58,699.97 soles through bank deposits without a known source.
This information is part of the investigation for the crime of illicit enrichment that is followed against the head of state. Boluarte is being investigated by the Public Ministry in the so -called Rolex Case, where he would allegedly increased his assets abusing his positions in the Executive Power.
In addition to the amount detected by the experts Sánchez Solórzano and Salinas Moncada, the luxury jewels and watches gifted by Oscorima Wilfredogovernor of Ayacucho.
The situation has led to the president’s lawyer, Juan Carlos Portugalrequest the realization of an audience to interrogate and contrary to both Sánchez Solórzano and Salinas Moncada, in order to clarify the content of the expert report, as well as the object of the expertise, the methodology used in the expert analysis and the conclusions achieved .
You can see: Julio Demartini renounces Midis in the midst of threats and corruption scandal in Qali Warma
Specialists consider that this could be sufficient proof for the investigation against Boluarte to advance
Preliminary investigation against Dina Boluarte For illicit enrichment culminated on January 16. As part of the process managed by the Prosecutor’s Office, the investigation could advance to a preparatory stage before reaching a formal accusation against the head of state. Different specialists consulted by The Republic They consider that the expert report presented, which would prove part of the funds not recognized by the president, would be sufficient to advance to the next phase of the fiscal process.
He considered it Andy Carriónlawyer and specialist in criminal law, who pointed out that this expert report is a key evidence within the investigation against Boluarte: “In investigations for crimes of corruption of officials, specifically due to illicit enrichment, one of the fundamental evidence is to determine if there is a patrimonial imbalance; that is, if the president of the Republic can justify their expenses with their income. If they differ , there would be a patrimonial imbalance, a situation that the Prosecutor’s Office, today, is identifying This would have solid elements to advance to the next stage, “he said.
You can see: Fredy Hinojosa: Frigoinca paid more than S/298,000 in coimas for benefiting with contracts in Qali Warma
A similar line followed Joel Córdovaexabected from the Attorney General of the State, who considered that, although this is sufficient proof to advance the investigation, the previous prejudice that must be done so that the president can be submitted to a preparatory investigation must be taken into account.
“The finding of a heritage imbalance in the president, according to an expertise carried out within the framework of the investigation for illicit enrichment, corroborates part of the Public Ministry’s hypothesis. This expertise will be crucial for an eventual constitutional complaint, since it would preliminary accredit an increase In the president’s assets that is not justified accounting. The Congress, due to the prerogative of prejudice that protects the presidency, “he added.
You can see: Carlos Ferrero Costa, former president of the Council of Ministers, at 83 years old, dies
Mario Amorettialso a specialist in Criminal Law, he seconded what was sustained by Córdova: “The crime of illicit enrichment is configured when, according to an accounting expertise, it is evident that a public official has an unjustified patrimonial imbalance. For example, if an official perceives a salary of S/100, but spends or invests S/500, an illicit enrichment is presumed. who must prove it. Congress of the Republic authorize the lifting of the prerogative of political prejudice. This procedure implies an initial evaluation by the subcommission of constitutional accusations, followed by a vote in the Plenary of Congress. Only after obtaining this authorization, the Public Ministry can proceed with the corresponding preparatory investigation, “he said.
Delia Espinoza evaluates constitutionally demanding Dina Boluarte
According to sources from the Republic, the Prosecutor of the Nation, Delia Espinozais analyzing the information collected, including accounting and financial expert opinions, reports of the Comptroller Dina Boluarte Before Congress, considering the need to move towards the stage of preparatory investigation to proceed with a public trial.
As the experts consulted in this note mentioned, the passage to a preparatory investigation against the president of the Republic previously requires the lifting of their immunity through an prejudice. This means that it will depend on Congress of the Republic that the case against the president for illicit enrichment continues to progress.
