L
ATO OCTOBER 2 From 2025 in Mexico City, a march conceived to commemorate the tragic 1968 watershed in Tlatelolco became something else: a raw canvas of the global fracture. Beyond the unfortunate samples of anarchic violence and unpunished that, unfortunately, these mobilizations accompany, an unequivocal symptom of our times emerged: the prolastin manifestation.
What link could the conflict have in the Gaza Strip with the Mexican student repression of 57 years ago? Objectively, none. However, Mexico City is not an island outside the global pulse. The dynamic is already a universal pattern: almost any manifestation, of whatever, ends up converging in Gaza. We see it in the verbal quarrels of the Spanish Parliament sessions, in protests on pension issues in France and, even, even in civil rights marches in the United States. All, sooner or later, end in Gaza.
The key question is: why? The answer is as simple as terrifying: the world is active, in real time, from the palm of the hand and through a cell phone, what the right and the dictionary define as genocide: the deliberate extermination of a population, of a people, for reasons of race and religion. The ubiquitual and immediacy of technology have made each global citizen a face-to-face witness of the humanitarian crisis. Gaza has become the moral epicenter of global protests, the crucible where sensitivity and outrage is measured in the face of the injustice of massive.
The narrative of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, focused on the need to crush Hamas without repairing costs after the wild terrorist attacks to the Israeli civilian population, has been totally exceeded. For international public opinion, the line that separates the legitimate rematch of the state of Israel against a terrorist organization and the extermination of the Palestinian people in Gaza has been erased completely.
Israel has achieved an undeniable military advance in the field, but its ruling elite has lost, in a loud way, the communication war. This defeat is so deep that even fracture to its main allies and the global Jewish community itself. A recent survey of the Washington Post It is revealing: 61 percent of the American Jews surveyed states that Israel has committed “war crimes” in the conflict. This data underlines a deep dissonance between the strategy of the Israeli government elite and the moral conscience of a significant part of its own diaspora.
The decisions of the elite that governs Israel have managed to strengthen their internal position in the short term, but have had a devastating effect for the Jewish people in the world. This town is today more exposed than ever to a virulen-to resurgence of anti-Semitism and the veiled or strident justification of violence against them. They have lost to the international community, before their traditional allies and before nations that maintained a neutral position.
This conflict, more than a war for territory has become a circular hatred. The images of destruction and the losses of innocent lives will sow in entire generations of Palestinians a hatred fed by cruelty and loss, a burden that the people of Israel must support in the coming decades.
The magnitude of Netanyahu’s decisions has not only generated the most relevant humanitarian crisis of recent years, but has paid to global geopolitical instability and the radicalization of extreme positions. He has offered ammunition to international polarization and has strengthened actors who feed on regional chaos. This is a war that, hopefully, could know a temporary truce, but that, due to its essence and open wounds in collective consciousness, simply and simply, it does not have a predictable purpose.
The day It has been consisting of “head” the notes such as what we are attesting: a genocide. One that also betrays the irrelevance of the institutions created in the postwar period to avoid invasions, holocausts and the escalation of all conflicts.
