Ecuadorian president Daniel Noboa questioned whether Nicolás Maduro understands the concept of democracy and pointed out that “first he should transparent the results of his own elections, which were widely questioned by the Venezuelans themselves and the international community”
The president of Ecuador, Daniel Noboa, rejected the accusations of “horrible fraud” made by Nicolás Maduro about the elections in that country, and challenged him to demonstrate the transparency of the electoral processes in Venezuela.
“What legitimacy have the words of a person questioned by the multiple irregularities committed to remain in the position of president, creating a dictatorial, totalitarian and repressive government,” said Noboa in An interview to the Colombian environment Week.
As Maduro said, without showing support from his statements, in Ecuador a “horrible fraud” orchestrated from the United States was committed and with support from the Venezuelan organization sumate.
The Ecuadorian president questioned whether Maduro understands the concept of democracy and pointed out that “first he should transparent the results of his own elections, which were widely questioned by the Venezuelans themselves and the international community.”
The candidate of Correismo to the elections, Luisa González, claimed “irregularities” in the Ecuadorian presidentials after the National Electoral Council of that country announced the victory of Noboa with more than 56% of the votes. On Wednesday he reiterated his request that all the minutes of the election be published.
The National Electoral Council of Ecuador has supported its results. His president, Diana Atamaint, also commented that “if Mr. Maduro says there was fraud, that means that in Ecuador we are doing things well. The serious thing would have been to congratulate us ».
*Journalism in Venezuela is exercised in a hostile environment for the press with dozens of legal instruments arranged for the punishment of the word, especially the laws “against hatred”, “against fascism” and “against blockade.” This content is being published taking into account the threats and limits that, consequently, have been imposed on the dissemination of information from within the country.
Post views: 336