Cristina KirchnerPresident and former president of Argentina, has requested the restitution of their privilege retirements and the life pension he perceived as a widow of Nestor Kirchner. This request arises after the decision of the Government of Javier Milei to suspend these assignments due to his conviction in the road cause.
In his defense, Cristina Kirchner He has argued that these retirements are his only means of subsistence, since in 2016 he gave all his assets, both his own and those inherited from her husband, her children Máximo and Florencia Kirchner.
In 2016, Cristina Kirchner He transferred the totality of his assets to his children, which, according to his lawyer Facundo Fernández Pastor, left her without his own assets. In addition, it faces a judicial inhibition that prevents any income that you receive is used, since it would be automatically paralyzed.
Therefore, its monthly life assignments, which include retirement as former president and the pension as a widow of Nestor Kirchner, were his only source of income until his suspension. The lawyer of Cristina He presented a precautionary measure before the jurisdiction of social security, arguing that the government’s decision constitutes a “violation of an food right” and affects its right to social security, subsistence and, ultimately, to life.
According to the writing, the measure is a form of political persecution that seeks to limit its capacity for political representation and its right to subsistence. In his defense, Cristina Kirchner He has indicated the case of Zulema Yoma, widow of former president Carlos Menem, who continues to receive a life pension despite the sentences that weigh on the ex -president.
According to his lawyer, this precedent demonstrates an unequal and arbitrary treatment towards Cristina, since there are no clear legal foundations to justify the suspension of its benefits. The defense argument also emphasizes that Law 24.018, which regulates privilege retirements, does not establish the possibility of revoking these assignments in cases such as Cristina.
Suspension
Therefore, they consider that the government’s decision is illegal and responds to political motivations. Before the suspension, Cristina Kirchner He received a net monthly income of approximately 22 million pesos, which included his retirement as former president and the pension as a widow of Nestor Kirchner.
These income were essential for their subsistence, according to their defense, since it does not have other means to cover their basic needs. The suspension of these assignments has generated an intense debate in public opinion and in the political sphere. While some sectors consider that the measure is fair and necessary, others see it as an act of political persecution that seeks to weaken a key figure of Peronism.
Followers in Google News And in our channel of Instagramto continue enjoying the latest news and our best content.
