The Special Monitoring Chamber to Judgment T-760 of 2008 of the Constitutional Court, through car 089 of February 4, 2025, evaluated the request for clarification submitted by the Ministry of Health and Social Protection with respect to the 007 of 2025.
(See: MINSALUD says that he is not in a situation of contempt with respect to the courts of the court)
The request, which contained fifty questions and fourteen reasons for doubt, It was dismissed by the Chamber by not complying with the required argumentative load.
According to the Court, although the Ministry met the legitimation requirements in the case and opportunity, His request did not reflect doubts about the writing of the order or about a specific word or phrase of providence.
(Also read: Why grew health access barriers in the country for cancer patients)
On the contrary, the application sought to issue value judgments on the content of the ruling, require guidelines on its execution and question the powers of the High Court. Said intentions They exceed the purpose of a request for clarification and contravene the provisions of the constitutional jurisprudence and in article 285 of the General Code of the Process.
The Chamber emphasized that the decisions adopted are based and supported by data contributed mostly by the Ministry of Health itself. Nevertheless, He recalled that the information provided by this entity has been insufficient and incomplete, Despite the repeated requirements and opportunities granted for improvement.
(See: How long can EPS postulate maximum budget payments, according to ADRES?)
Judge
Istock
In this sense, The Court stressed that the orders dictated in car 007 of 2025 do not lack support and that the fulfillment of them cannot be expanded due to improper questions.
(See: New EPS does not deliver financial information since March 2024)
Likewise, the High Court made it clear that no appeal does not proceed against this decision, so the terms for the fulfillment of the orders of the 007 of 2025 They will continue their course from the notification of this providence.
In that contextthe Ministry of Health must comply with the established deadlines, including the creation of a work table within ten days, The presentation of a report justifying the setting of the Capitation Payment Unit (UPC) of 2025 in a month and the development of a tool for the verification of information in a period of three months.
(Read more: Six EPS intervened leave the guilds to optimize health resources)
With this decision, the Constitutional Court reaffirms its position regarding compliance with the measures ordered in health, making a call to rigor in the argumentation of requests and the strict observance of their determinations.
