Today: December 12, 2024
November 13, 2024
1 min read

Constitutional Court prohibited a practice that many performed on their pets as “aesthetic”: they consider it unnecessary

Constitutional Court prohibited a practice that many performed on their pets as "aesthetic": they consider it unnecessary

Photo: YouTubeExpertAnimal

Some practices were exempt after the decision and can continue to be carried out.

News Colombia.

In a historic decision, the Constitutional Court of Colombia prohibited procedures on animals, such as the mutilation of ears or tails, that were carried out under the excuse of being “aesthetic practices.” This measure responds to a lawsuit presented in 2024, supported by the Ministry of Environment and the Attorney General’s Office.

Also read:

A 1989 law allowed these surgeries to be performed, under the justification that their purpose was purely “aesthetic.” However, the lawsuit argued that these practices were not only unnecessary, but represented a serious risk to the integrity of the animals.

In its ruling, the Court declared the unenforceability of the expression “aesthetic” contained in article 6 of Law 84 of 1989. According to the official statement, the court highlighted that this modification aims to protect animals from acts that may be considered cruel or unnecessary. From now on, any invasive procedure that is not justified for health reasons will be prohibited.

Despite the decision, there are some exceptions

However, the Court made it clear that there are exceptions. Surgical interventions that are carried out for technical, scientific or zooprophylactic reasons, such as those that seek to prevent diseases or improve the animal’s quality of life, will continue to be permitted.

Furthermore, the court stressed the importance of recognizing animals as sentient beingswhich implies that they deserve to be treated with dignity and respect, as established by the Political Constitution from Colombia. In this way, the Court reaffirms its commitment to animal protection and welfare.

It is important to note that this decision It does not affect practices such as periodic nail or hair trimming in some species, since these are not considered cruel or constitute abuse.. According to the Court, such procedures do not affect the animal’s living tissues and are common in routine pet care.

The Constitutional Court has taken a crucial step to ensure that pets are treated with the care and protection they deserve, and has sent a clear message against animal abuse disguised as aesthetics.

You can also read:



Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

Portada del libro 'Estambul', de Orham Pamuk
Previous Story

Ship with weapons for the Castro regime: a terrible accident in Istanbul

Understand Caixa’s new real estate financing rules
Next Story

Caixa’s profit rises 21.6% and reaches R$9.4 billion in 2024

Latest from Blog

Go toTop