The memorial of the Acciopopulist María del Carmen Alva has about 250 copies and was published with the resource of the Editorial Fund of the Congress.
He Congress of the republic spent approximately S/7,357 to print the memorial on the management of the former president of this state power and congresswoman of Acción Popular Maria Del Carmen Alva. This is detailed in the document he obtained The Republic after having requested access to public information on this case.
The document of Alva Prieto has as name “Management report: Presidency of the Congress of the Republic 2021-2022” and has some 250 copies, which were prepared at the request of the Communications Office. In addition, the report refers to detailed spending on printed matter.
- 1,568 soles in 196 positive plate units CTP 74.5 x 60.5 cm.
- 286 soles in 88 units of 300-gram matte couché paper.
- 4,883 soles in 4,138 units of 115-gram glossy coated paper.
- 620 soles in inputs such as inks, solvents, laminating film, among others.
Detail on the impression of the memorial of Alva Prieto. Photo: document.
According to sources in Congress, the preparation of these copies or reports was based on a personal decision of the heads of Parliament. They also detail that the Fondo Editorial is in charge only of printing, while the Department of Investigation and Parliamentary Documentation provides the necessary information to the office of the president of the Congress so that your team, in most cases, is in charge of writing the text.
What does the memorial of María del Carmen Alva contain?
In the 192 pages on the memory of the management of the acciopulista Maria Del Carmen Alva the 25 interpellations made to the ministers of State during the management of Peter Castillo, the two vacancy motions against the ex-president vacated, the four motions of censure against ministers, as well as the 11 motions of censure against “the surpassed Board of Directors.”
In addition, mention is made of the creation of the Special Commission for the Selection of suitable candidates for the election of the Ombudsmanwhich had two unsuccessful attempts due to a precautionary measure imposed as a result of the amparo action filed by the Ombudsman union.
