Cesar Hinostroza, former supreme judge appointed as leader of the criminal organization Los Necks Blancos del Puerto, was accused by the plenary session of Congress of violating articles 317, 385, 395, 398 and 400 of the Penal Code.
The approval of the report against Hinostroza Pariachi occurs after the Subcommittee on Constitutional Accusations (SAC) support the constitutional complaint for the alleged commission of crimes of criminal organization, illegal sponsorship, specific passive bribery, active bribery and aggravated influence peddling.
Indeed, with 79 votes in favor, none against and seven abstentionsthe plenary session of Parliament decided to continue with the constitutional complaint against Cesar Hinostrozawho is in Spain awaiting his extradition to Peru to answer to justice for his alleged links with Los Necks Blancos.
With 79 votes in favor, 0 against and 7 abstentions, the plenary session of Parliament admitted the complaint against César Hinostroza. Photo: Congress
YOU CAN SEE: Congress approves accusation against Pedro Chávarry, but does not admit disqualification from public office
Earlier, the same Cesar Hinostroza He gave his defenses before the constitutional accusation against him. The former magistrate pointed out that the report presented by Rosío Torres, APP legislator and head of the SAC“has no legal basis” and accused “being a victim of anti-Fujimorism.”
“This is a persecution against me to get me out of the Judiciary and capture the institutions. The audio scandal was due to subordinate interests. They are victims of anti-Fujimorism because someone finds out that I had a conversation with a political party that they hate (People’s Force),” he said.
Constitutional complaint against César Hinostroza, Tomás Gálvez, Orlando Velásquez and Julio Gutiérrez Pebe. Photo: capture/Congress agenda
It should be remembered that the Public Prosecutor’s Office requested the extradition of Cesar Hinostroza for allegedly bribing an official in charge of Migration control in Tumbes with 10,000 dollars so that he does not activate the alarm of prohibition to leave the country that was on him and thus be able to flee when he was being investigated for corruption.
