For his part, legislator Almílcar Sandoval defended the response of the Ministry of Finance, by not reporting the details of the destination of the expense.
“This fund has its rules. its ways of verifying the expense, it is not of free will. That could be the temptation of some other government”, he maintained.
“What happened? Well, a gigantic pandemic, that affected all economies and also the instability of the war in Europe affected ”, she added.
Salomón Chertorivsky, from Movimiento Ciudadano, demanded transparency in the use of the FEIP.
“Of course we had difficult years, but we have 150 billion pesos that were taken out of the fund and are in the Treasury!” he pointed out.
The PRI deputy José Francisco Yunes affirmed that this government received the Fund with 300,000 million pesos and the following year it had already been left at 170 billion pesos.
“If the collection is 1 peso and we put 1.50 pesos, those 50 cents are charged to the budget revenue stabilization fund and that is what has meant that nearly 250,000 million pesos have been used in two years, which is what that should be in reserve for when the collection processes were under pressure, ”he explained.
Morenista Daniel Gutiérrez proposed studying the possibility of also strengthening the Federal Entities Income Stabilization Fund (FEIEF), but it did not prosper.
