Political parties must agree to modify the health financingas stated Chanel Rosa Chupany, former director of the National Health Service.
He assured that this must be done in such a way that, with the elections just around the corner, no one is harmed by said decisions and no party takes political advantage.
“We must quickly get out of the subject of the Family Health Insurance, plaster implies an agreement of the political parties to modify the financing of health, financing that implies covering medications, procedures and diseases currently excluded”, said the former official through his Twitter account.
according to rose chupanywho also directed the National Health Insurance (Senasa), taxes on alcohol, soft drinks and cigarettes must be increased to finance the High Cost Program and coverage for traffic accidents.
In a message thread, he said that if the resources of the Social Security and the first level of primary care is implemented as the gateway to the system, there will not be enough resources to pay the providers and expand the catalog of benefits.
“If something is worth reaching an agreement on, it is health”, said rose chupany in one of his messages.
He added that in the Social Security, “we have business owners of ARS, they are interested in their businesses earning money, which is legitimate; there are businessmen who own laboratories, clinics, diagnostic centers, etc., whose interest is that their businesses also earn money”.
In the opinion of Chanel Rosa Chupanythe interest of employers is a robust Family Health Insurance so that their employees feel protected, which will save them.
He considered that businessmen “are key to getting out of the current situation, and business associations should know that they also represent that part of the business community, which is also the majority and that so far does not have much space in the discussions” that are taking place currently being carried out for the reform of the Social Security.
It is remembered that the National Social Security Council created a Special Commission to deal with the reforms of the Law of Social Security and the impasse between the Medical Association and the ARS.
It has held several meetings with the main players in the system, in which the differences between doctors and Health Risk Administrators have been addressed over the issue of payment of fees.
Last year the medical union began a plan to fight against the ARS in demand for claims that include an increase in fees and rates, coverage of outpatient consultations, among others.
The struggle has included regional and national marches, a stoppage of services to some insurers and the massive disaffiliation of ARS Universal, and has suspended services to Mapfre affiliates, ARS Monumental in the North, Simag in the East and Renacer in the South of the country. The doctors have threatened to continue suspending services to other ARS in the system.
