Theristas Causa remember that a year ago, after “an epic deed”, Venezuelans were victims of “abuse of power and implacable persecution” by security forces
The National Political Directorate of Cause R affirms that Venezuelans maintain the hope of change and continue to fight to enforce the results of the presidential elections in which, Edmundo González Urrutia won.
«At one year of this electoral blow we have not forgotten and we have not withdrawn, because our victory is alive. The struggle to enforce the citizen democratic verdict continues in resistance, ”says a statement published on July 28.
The Causerristas remember that a year ago, after “an epic deed”, Venezuelans were victims of “abuse of power and implacable persecution” by security forces.
They emphasize that on July 28 the citizens spoke “strong and with absolute clarity” about the need and urgency of a political change in the country. A year later, they say, “the flame of the 28J is still on in each heart and in each family.”
Cause Run
The 28J flame is still on in each heart and in each family.
A year ago Venezuelan citizens in an epic deed, marked by abuse of power and implacable persecution against democratic forces, spoke strongly and with absolute 🧵 pic.twitter.com/6TDHFQ8WDM
– The cause я (@lacausarve) July 28, 2025
The Unitary Democratic Platform also issued a statement on July 28 in which it ensures that “Venezuela has not surrendered” and despite attempts to “hide the truth” citizenship maintains the hope of a real change in the country.
«A year ago, on July 28, Venezuela spoke with courage. Millions went to the UMAS challenging persecution, censorship and fear. They did it with a deep conviction: change the course of the country by democratic route, ”says the document published in X.
*Journalism in Venezuela is exercised in a hostile environment for the press with dozens of legal instruments arranged for the punishment of the word, especially the laws “against hatred”, “against fascism” and “against blockade.” This content was written taking into consideration the threats and limits that, consequently, have been imposed on the dissemination of information from within the country.
Post views: 64
