Violentist preaching, full of hate and anti -democratic of Antauro Humala, the leader of the self -denominated ethnocacerismo that murdered four police officers in the so -called ‘Andahuaylazo’, on January 1, 2005, left out of any electoral process to the National Alliance of Workers, Workers, Farmers, university students, reservists and workers (antur). A forceful sentence, approved unanimously, of the Permanent Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, established by declaring the illegality of the group and providing the cancellation of its registration before the Registry of Political Organizations (ROP) of the National Jury of Elections (JNE).
The question is, what will happen to the sentenced Humala Antaur that he intended to apply for nothing less than the Presidency of the Republic with the Antauro shirt and that now, after the judicial ruling ultimately, has it been unable to do so? Are you enabled to apply to the Senate or the Chamber of Deputies in 2026?
Four experts in electoral and constitutional matters ratified, in Peru21TV, the impossibility of a presidential candidacy of Humala having lost its partisan affiliation. As for their eventual aspirations to a congressional seat, they made clear, with nuances, that their participation in the contest is in the hands of the JNE.
LOOK: Antauro party is dissolved by encouraging hatred and violence
For José Manuel Villalobos, Executive Director of the Peruvian Institute of Electoral Law, after the cancellation of his group, Antaur “To register as a candidate in another party other than his should have resigned one year in advance of the date of closing registration of the electoral process,” that is, no later than December 23.
He argued that the issue generates “legal uncertainty”, and warned that it will be the JNE who will have to resolve, either in August, when the registration of candidates for primary elections in the parties is made, or in December when the lists are registered definitive
“It is not rehabilitated”
From the perspective of the constitutionalist lawyer Aníbal Quiroga, Antaur of civil reparation ”. That said, he indicated that the possibility of his application to Congress gives rise to a “legal dispute” that the jury will have to resolve. “The law says that to apply when one is registered in a party he has to resign a year before and he did not, but there are those who point out that as his party has disappeared legally he no longer has that impediment and he could do it. I have no doubt that any irresponsible movement or political grouping wants to use it as a locomotive to pull people to Congress, that is, senators or deputies, but that legal discussion will finally be resolved by the JNE, as it did in the case of Vladimir Cerrón, ”he said.
For Víctor García Toma, former president of the Constitutional Court, the risk of a group trying discard “In theory Humala would have the free court to apply,” he observed. What should we do? “Political organizations should sign a pact of honor and commit to not registering as candidates for all those who have a conviction, and if there is any who do not want to sign that commitment, it will be denounced before public opinion,” he said.
LOOK: Cecilia Valenzuela on Antauro: “The Supreme Court has done what the JNE should have done”
Reserves similar to those of Garcia Toma also expressed Marianella Ledesma, former president of the Constitutional Court, who greeted the fact that the Supreme Court “has analyzed among the right of a citizen to express and associate to participate in political life versus the right of others Citizens to want to live in peace ”, determining that what weighs the most is the latter in a democratic scenario.
On the possibility that it is intended to register Humala’s candidacy to Congress anticipated that the issue will undoubtedly open a discussion because “one thing is that I voluntarily renounce to participate in a political group within the legal term and another thing is that they cancel me not only the movement, but everything else that this sentence implies; There the panorama is different. They are two different assumptions that I think at some point, if they manage to invite Humala to participate (in the contest) it will possibly be a matter of reflection for the electoral authorities, ”he concluded.
Anyway, the declaration of illegality of the Antaur party is a thing judged and there is no reversal. It remains to be seen if political parties honor their commitment to democracy.
TAKE INTO ACCOUNT
The first vice president of Congress, Patricia Juárez, described as a “good news” the declaration of illegality of the Antaur party for her “violent and antidemocratic message.”
The legislator requested that it be reviewed in what conditions Antauro Humala was released, who was sentenced to 19 years in prison for the murder of four police officers in the ‘Andahuaylazo’ of January 1, 2005, but only turned just over 17 years.
Take advantage of the new experience, receive by WhatsApp our enriched digital newspaper. Peru21 Epaper.
Now available in Yape! Find us in Yape Promos.
