N
or there is no section or article of the Charter of the United Nations (CNU) that indicates the authorization to intervene in the internal affairs of any nation, whether or not it is a member of the United Nations Organization (UN). There are also no indications about the right to peaceful invasion
or to the partial diplomatic relationship with some territorial sector of another country.
In fact, article 1 of the CNU indicates that the purposes of the United Nations Organization are aimed at maintaining peace and security among all the countries of the world. Each member agrees to collaborate, collectively, to “prevent and eliminate threats to the peace, and to suppress acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace; and achieve by peaceful means, and in accordance with the principles of justice and international law, the adjustment or settlement of international controversies or situations likely to lead to breaches of the peace…”
The UN reiterates the recommendation to refrain from threatening or attacking using force against the territorial integrity of another member of said organization. Even if the reasons are to support the political independence of a country, or the separation of a territorial fraction, as is the case of Taiwan.
The intention of the United States (EU) is to reinforce the supposed idea of retrieve
the independence of the largest of the islands belonging to the archipelago of the China Sea (Taiwan), a territory legally recognized as part of the People’s Republic of China.
Territorial disputes are present throughout history. However, the eternal example of the interventionist country par excellence, the US, has no intention of respecting the agreements before the highest world organization, such as the UN, to avoid wars between nations. As if it didn’t exist. His warmongering policy forces him to maintain threats of all kinds so as not to weaken the most profitable business he has to date: the war industry.
In the offices where his legislative apparatus receives the political line, it is evident that his advisers and strategists disdain the current geopolitics, or have no knowledge about geography, history and diplomacy. They are moved by the ambition to appropriate any useful territory for their interests. This is the essence of the trade policy of their companies, with the support or complicity of their governments, whether Republican or Democratic.
Recently, the US government said that the surveillance actions by the Chinese air force over the South China Sea are a provocation by the government of President Xi Jinping. Xi’s response was a warning to President Joseph Biden not to intervene in matters that do not concern him.
It is already known that the island of Taiwan and its capital, Taipei, belong to the People’s Republic of China and that it has been a territory of great economic and commercial interest for the US and, of course, of military interest as well.
Biden’s position is the same as always, he considers that this insular region is independent from China and that he will continue to maintain diplomatic relations with that country
notwithstanding the international recognition of the archipelago as part of China.
The conflict is old, but the US maintains its illegal intervention in the affairs of the islands, especially the largest of them. Although recognized as international waters, China has the right to defend its coastlines. But US policy insists on being the main defender of the maritime corridor through which countless merchant ships pass, basically.
The Xi government once again calls on the US not to interfere in territory legally recognized as part of China, for which it insisted: it is the firm will of more than 1.4 billion Chinese people to firmly safeguard China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity
.
Biden’s proposal was a possible meeting between the two countries, in the coming months, to determine the situation of the China Sea region. The intervention of Jung Pak, who is the deputy assistant secretary of the State Department for East Asian affairs, emphasizes the danger caused by Chinese aviation when intercepting planes that transit through international waters of the archipelago.
Although Pak does not clarify what kind of danger he is referring to, we know that it is the US formula for continuing to intervene and sow conflicts in order to obtain benefits, especially economic ones, from the confrontations promoted by their country.
Without diplomatic, commercial and military conflicts, the US would have an economic crisis, as well as a dangerous social upheaval at home.
