Amparo Abraham Farah to live with their child

Sanjuana Martínez

La Jornada newspaper
Wednesday, February 19, 2025, p. 13

The Judicial Branch of the Federation granted an indirect amparo to Aída Victoria Abraham Farah, to initiate coexistence with his son Patricio, illegally suspended by his father Ricardo Plaza Porteous.

At last it seems that a window that allows Mrs. Aída Abraham to have some kind of coexistence with her little son of only nine years, after more than four months of having been taken from her side for a very questionable decision without sustenance some factual by the tenth judge of the family José Jorge Cázares Vieyrasaid lawyer Francisco Martínez Márquez.

Derived from the indirect amparo trial number 35/2025 in the Seventh District Court in Civil Matters of Mexico City, Judge Concepción Martín Argumosa issued an interlocutory sentence that the Chamber and the Court must comply with to do all the proceedings in order that the child has visits and coexistence with his mother.

The resumption of meetings determined by the judge can be through electronic means and at the Center for Family Coexistence of Mexico care (Cecofam): The most beneficial thing would be for daily electronic means to be met and on weekends supervised in the CecofamSaid the lawyer.

The day He has had access to the sentence that clearly specifies the right of Aída Victoria to be with his son: Since any judicial contest in which inherent rights are involved in minors must be resolved without disregarding a basic principle such as the best interest of the child, as provided by the Convention on the Rights of the Child; The Law for the Protection of the Rights of Girls, Children and Adolescents, and the Law on the Rights of Girls and Children in the Federal District (today Mexico City), in which the responsible authorities are ordered to carry out how many proceedings as many proceedings are necessary in order to establish a provisional regime of supervised coexistence.

The judge established in her sentence that the meetings can be through video calls, on digital platforms or supervised in closed spaces.

Indeed, it is important to note that the right of visits and coexistence is a fundamental institution of family law, above the will of the person custody to the child, a human right addressed to minorsindicate in the document.

To do this, the federal authority referred to the thesis number L.5O.C.107C, supported by the Fifth Collegiate Court in Civil Matters of the First Circuit, published in volume 32, of August 2010 of the Judicial Weekly of the Federation and his Gazettepage 2268, ninth era, which says:

Right of visits and coexistence. Its concept: it is a fundamental institution of family law in Mexico, which aims to regular Above the will of the person in whose charge is the custody of the minor, because it is a human right mainly addressed to him, although he also indirectly favors his ascendants and those who make up said group.

Therefore, after this judgment the responsible authorities must prove compliance with the ordered, within three days: This is a light along the way, a significant advance. The amparo authority is already realizing reality. It seems that someone finally listens to, there is a brightness of hope in the dreary labyrinth of the Superior Court of Justice of Mexico CitySaid the lawyer.

And he explained that he hopes Judge Jorge Cázares Vieyra will drive with impartiality and fulfill your obligation to solve what is most favorable for the child.

Added: There is the expectation of whether the child’s father finally favors the rights of his child allowing him communication and regular coexistence with his mother mother, or if he will continue to hinder them through legal arguments, corruption or extrajudicial machinations.

In the event that Ricardo Plaza Porteous refuses to comply with the sentence, the consequences may be greater: This will be a more palpable sample of vicarious violence and could be credited to the loss of parental rights.