The processing of Alberto Fernández In the case for gender violence against Fabiola Yañez, it has generated a strong political and media impact in Argentina. The Federal Chamber of Buenos Aires recently confirmed the processing of the former president, accusing him of minor and serious injuries aggravated for having committed in a context of gender violence, as well as coercive threats.
This ruling leaves him in a position to face an oral trial, while he continues to defend his position and question the judicial process. The cause originated from complaints made by Fabiola Yañez, who claimed to have suffered physical and psychological aggressions during his relationship with Alberto Fernández.
According to the Federal Chamber ruling, the events occurred between 2016 and 2024, in a context marked by an asymmetric power relationship and a vulnerability situation of the victim. The tests provided include testimonies, medical records and photographs that document the injuries.
Fernández He has categorically denied the accusations, qualifying them as “false” and arguing that they are part of a political strategy to discredit it. In radio interviews, the former president has indicated that Yañez’s complaint was used to question his commitment to gender policies that he promoted during his mandate.
In addition, he has filed complaints against Yañez for false testimony and coercive threats. The former president has also criticized federal judge Julián Ercolini, who instructed the case, and has requested his challenge, claiming lack of impartiality.
Fernández He stressed that one of the judges of the Chamber, Roberto Boico, voted against the confirmation of the processing, which considers an indication that the case still has aspects that must be investigated. The case has generated an intense debate in public opinion and has put issues such as gender violence and the responsibility of political leaders in the center of the discussion.
Legal actions
While some sectors criticize Fernández and demand that they face the legal consequences of their actions, others question the veracity of the accusations and indicate possible political motivations behind the case. In addition, Fernández’s processing has had implications in his public image and his political legacy.
The accusations have affected their credibility and have generated doubts about their commitment to gender policies that he promoted during his mandate. The case of Alberto Fernández and Fabiola Yañez is an example of how accusations of gender violence can have deep legal, political and social repercussions.
Followers in Google News And in our channel of Instagramto continue enjoying the latest news and our best content.
