After a dark week, the Government will try to turn the page

The recent report by the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INDEC) on poverty in Argentina has revealed alarming figures for the Government: 52.9% of the population in the country’s main urban agglomerations lives in poverty, which is equivalent to about 24 million people. Within this group, 18.1% are destitute.

These data, corresponding to the first half of the year, have generated a brief but intense reaction in the political sphere, although they have quickly been displaced from the public agenda. He government Javier Milei, who recently took office, has faced criticism for the lack of a serious and in-depth debate about these figures.

Instead of addressing the problem comprehensively, the responses have mostly been exculpatory, attributing the situation to the “inheritance received” and the need for inevitable economic adjustments.

However, this stance has been seen by many as a way to shirk responsibility and avoid a deeper analysis of current policies and their long-term effects. Poverty in Argentina is not a new phenomenon, but the current trend is particularly worrying.

After a dark week, the Government will try to turn the page

The escalation of poverty and destitution has worsened management after management, from the governments of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, Mauricio Macri and Alberto Fernández, to the current administration. This continuity in socioeconomic deterioration reflects a lack of effective and sustainable policies to combat poverty and improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable population.

One of the most worrying aspects of the INDEC report is the disproportionate impact of poverty on children and adolescents. Studies show that poverty rates are significantly higher in these age groups, suggesting an uncertain future for a large part of the country’s young population.

After a dark week, the Government will try to turn the page

Resources

Lack of access to basic resources, quality education and development opportunities can have devastating long-term consequences, perpetuating the cycle of poverty and social exclusion. Despite the seriousness of the situation, the political response and management of the Government has been limited. Public statements have focused on discharging responsibilities and minimizing the impact of the figures, instead of proposing concrete and effective solutions.

This lack of action and commitment has generated a feeling of disillusionment and frustration among the population, who see how their needs and problems are ignored by those who should be working to improve their living conditions.

Source link