Three hours before the summons time expired, the Special Prosecution Office of the Corruption Administrative (Pepca) deposited this Thursday morning the accusation against Major General Adam Caceresthe pastor Rossy Guzmán and the others involved in the coral case.
The Public Ministry had until 1:05 in the afternoon and they went to court at 10:00 in the morning.
The deposit was headed by court attorney Mirna Ortíz together with a team from Pepca. These led to the Coordination of the Investigating Courts of the National District, in addition to the accusation, three boxes of documentary evidence that include financial information, audit reports from the Chamber of Accounts and other supporting evidence.
This occurs after the injunction made by Judge Raymundo Mejía, of the First Investigating Court of the National District, since Pepca had allowed the two-month period granted to complete the investigation to expire.
The facts of coral case
Pepca investigations establish that Adam Caceres He took advantage of his functions, his proximity and support from the political power to create an alleged corrupt network to divert public funds through the Specialized Presidential Security Corps (Cusep), an institution he directed.
For these acts of corruption were subjected to the major general Adam Caceres, the pastor Rossy Guzmán, as well as police corporal Tanner Antonio Flete Guzmán, son of the nun; Police Colonel Rafael Núñez de Aza and Army Sergeant Alejandro José Montero Cruz, who are in pre-trial detention.
Against Raúl Alejandro Girón Jiménez house arrest was ordered for security reasons, for cooperating with the investigation of the Public Ministry.
The network allegedly extended to the Specialized Body for Tourist Security (Cestur). According to Pepca, these institutions included military and police officers who lent themselves to embezzle millionaires in exchange for small amounts of profit.
The network allegedly used religious institutions and non-profit organizations to launder money stolen from the public purse. They say that the defendants managed to considerably increase their assets in a way that they could not justify.
