Despite the complaints that there were among the so-called “corcholatas”, the TEPJF Chamber indicated “there is also no evidence of improper use of public resources.”
Regarding the personalized promotion, the judges did not find it “since the reported content shows that the purpose was to promote or highlight the career or achievements of a person who at that time was part of the public service with the purpose of positioning themselves before the citizens.” .
In general, the behaviors “did not exceed the limits of the law, since they were marked in an extraordinary process, which are valid because they are part of party activities and life” according to the magistrates.
Why were the “corcholatas” investigated?
The case derived from complaints filed by the National Action, Institutional Revolutionary (PRI) and the Democratic Revolution (PRD) parties, among others, and gave rise to 39 precautionary measures, included in 118 volumes, each with an average of 1,000 pages. , highlighted Judge Mónica Lozano Ayala.
For the relief of the proceedings, carried out by the Electoral Litigation Technical Unit (UTCE) of the National Electoral Institute (INE), 2,180 detailed records were drawn up, 601 events and more than 7,000 fences and billboards were verified, in addition to In the resolution, 89 electronic data storage devices were reviewed and the 338 people reported were interviewed.
In a single sentence, the Specialized Chamber accumulated the resolution of the 126 complaints, particularly against the six characters known as “corcholatas” who participated in the process to elect the coordination of the defense of the Fourth Transformation of Morena, from which Claudia Sheinbaum was elected. .
