The decision to Diego Armando Maradona He was recovered from his last operation in a home hospitalization was today the focus of a new audience of the trial for his death, in which a revealing recording was known where one of the accused doctors urged another to modify the historical clinic of the former soccer player so as not to be legally responsible for the decision of domiciliary hospitalization.
This Tuesday’s audience had the testimony of psychiatrist Ana Marcela Waisman Campos, who was in contact with Maradona’s medical team during his hospitalization at the Olivos Clinic, located on the outskirts of the city of Buenos Aires. In that clinic, the Argentine idol was intervened on November 3, 2020 by a subdural hematoma in the head, and remained there until the 11th of the same month, when he was transferred to a house in Tigre (province of Buenos Aires) to travel there the rest of his recovery.
Waisman Campos declared that he visited the star in the clinic but that he refused to be treated by her. The doctor also referred to her contacts with Maradona’s psychiatrist, Agustina Cosachov, and said she was in contact with her during those days and discussed the case of former soccer player.
During the hearing, in addition to making conversations between the two about medical issues, an audio sent on November 10 by Cosachov was reproduced to the Maradona Header, Leopoldo Luque, in which she mentioned a recommendation of Waisman Campos to eliminate the participation of both in the decision of the domiciliary hospitalist in the medical history of the ex -soccer player.
A video that highlights Cosachov
“This psychiatrist threw me some tips that seem to me that they are good about something that we have to put in the medical history before Diego leaves, that you can write it because they put a lot Home had been taken together between doctors and the family.
“Then, she suggested me, and the truth that I respect her a lot in her position, which legally suited us, which is actually true, to make a last evaluation saying that the family, say, in front of the different therapeutic options, it is the one who, understanding and understanding the risks of the options, agree and opt for home internment, because we are legally more covered,” he adds more covered in the recording. The question of who opted for Maradona to recover in a house instead of a clinic is one of the keys to his death.
The information provided by the witnesses who have declared so far indicates that, while the former soccer player recovered at the clinic, a meeting between relatives, doctors of the clinic, of the prepaid medicine company Swiss Medical and Luque and Cosachov was held in which two alternatives were raised: continue with the treatment in a rehabilitation clinic or do it in a house under the modality of domiciliary. Given the pre -existing pathologies of Maradona, the complaint states that the domicilia hospitalization for which it was finally chosen was “a way to condemn him to death.”
The idea was to recover at home
Two of Maradona’s daughters, as well as his ex -partner Verónica Ojeda, declared in the last weeks that Luque was very clear in his recommendation that the former soccer player recovered in a house and discarded the option of internally – voluntarily or by force – in a clinic.
“We argued the 3 options, we did not seem so bad because they promised us the same (in home hospitalization) than in the Olivos Clinic, and never happened. They cheated us in the most cruel way,” Dalma Maradona, one of the idol’s daughters, who assured that the housing conditions in which his father did not fit what they had promised them, said last Tuesday.
Regarding the housing conditions and the medical treatment that Maradona received there on Tuesday, two Swiss Medical workers, who separated the prepaid medicine company for the former soccer player’s failures.
In addition to Luque, Cosachov, the Swiss Medical company, Nancy Forlini, the psychologist Carlos Díaz, the doctor Pedro Di Spagna, the nursing coordinator Mariano Perroni and the nurse Ricardo Almirón, are judged in this process.
Read too
Nurse Gisela Madrid is also prosecuted but will face a jury trial, as requested. In this process, Judges Maximiliano Savarino, Verónica Di Tommaso and Julieta Makintach must determine if seven of the eight defendants are guilty of the crime of simple homicide with eventual intent, which has a maximum penalty of 25 years in prison.
