Vladimir Cerron issued a statement in response to César Hildebrandt with the aim of denying the existence of a plan to remove peter castle of the government. The secretary general of Peru Libre considered that what is written in the column “Plan V”published last July 1, are “fantasy” and “erratic” perceptions.
“In no partisan meeting, private, public, clandestine, or text message was it manifested or insinuated, by myself or another militant, the ‘purpose of getting rid of Pedro Castillo and replacing him with Dina Boluarte,’ so that she ‘is at charge of the speech of July 28’”, the politician pointed out in a letter published on July 2.
Cerrón Rojas clarified that the resignation of the head of state was due to the existing inconsistency in the fact that the president was part of the party’s ranks, despite the fact that the caucus did not consider itself a pro-government party. “In fact, Pedro Castillo, as he has stated on television, always had a purely electoral militancy, not one of a convicted and confessed nature, “he explained..
YOU CAN SEE: The Prosecutor’s Office and the Judiciary seek to strengthen the fight against corruption and speedy trials
In addition, he rejected the rumors about a supposed intention to remove the president from the presidential chair. “The party has no intention of disqualifying, suspending or vacating Pedro Castillo, it has never assumed such a position, but it does maintain a critical stance towards what it believes is questionable,” indicated in the letter published on the official website of Peru Libre.
On the other hand, the former regional governor of Junín argued the position that the bench adopted on June 30 regarding the censorship of minister Dimitri Senmache. The politician mentioned that this measure is the answer to “brutal persecution and legal and illegal adjustments” to which leaders and figures of the pencil party have been allegedly exposed, such as Waldemar Cerrón or Guido Bellido.
“The party is persecuted, but with the other standard, the escape of characters who have muddied the institutionality of the Government and also of the party is allowed. Should the party remain neutral?” Cerrón questioned in his letter.
