Today: December 23, 2024
May 13, 2022
1 min read

Miguel Ángel Toma resigned as government prosecutor since March

Miguel Ángel Toma. Foto de archivo


Miguel Angel Tomas.  file photo
Miguel Angel Tomas. file photo

The government prosecutor, Miguel Ángel Toma, presented his resignation from the post on March 17, but the Executive Branch did not make this fact public until it now emerged thanks to a request for access to information.

As published Underlinedthe resolution of the Ministry of Public Education (MEC) has the date mentioned, but it was only known now because the journalist of said medium, Daniel Rodríguez, made the request to access the data.

explanations

“The administration does not recognize or validate any of the assertions argued on the occasion of the resignation,” affirms the Executive Power in accepting the resignation. Toma deposited all pending money in state coffers and has no debts with the administration.

The journalist had requested to know the contents of Toma’s resignation letter, but the government did not send it, and only commented: “The acceptance of the resignation in no case means validating or acknowledging the statements that the official makes in his request.”

Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

Foreign Minister Plasencia and Secretary Barkindo paid tribute to the Liberator
Previous Story

Foreign Minister Plasencia and Secretary Barkindo paid tribute to the Liberator

Otro más renuncia del PLD, Hipólito Polanco recoge
Next Story

Yet another resignation from the PLD, Hipólito Polanco picks up

Latest from Blog

Fallo del TC podría desestabilizar partidos, alerta Finjus

TC ruling could destabilize parties, Finjus warns

Santo Domingo. – The executive vice president of the Institutionality and Justice Foundation (Finjus), Servio Tulio Castaños Guzmán, expressed his concern in light of the recent decision of the Constitutional Court that
Go toTop