In a public session broadcast by the videoconference system, the plenary determined that the local Electoral Court was not exhaustive in its investigation, and also failed to carry out the necessary steps to investigate the ownership of the accounts on social networks from which the reported events were published.
“The paper considers that the grievances where it is alleged that the investigation was not exhaustively unburdened are well founded, since the investigating authority failed to carry out the necessary steps to corroborate who is the owner of the social network accounts from which the denounced publications were made. “, according to the project of the magistrate Indalfer Infante Gonzáles that was endorsed without discussion of the plenary session.
The document abounds: “Similarly, it failed to collect information regarding the newspaper in which it is stated that publications were made to promote the defendant. Consequently, it is proposed to revoke the appealed judgment.
The Oaxacan Court must reopen the investigation and issue a new sentence in which they base whether or not the Morena candidate committed anticipated pre-campaign acts.
