In its resolution, the Specialized Chamber determined the non-existence of the improper use of the guideline, the anticipated campaign acts, the violation of the fairness of the contest, as well as the political communication model and the duty of care on the part of Morena.
However, with regard to the violation of the best interests of children, it was concluded that the people who participated in the promotional “Marina Vitela in every corner” were of legal age.
While in the promotional “Marina pride”, although it was confirmed that there were documents that accredited the mother’s consent and the girl’s opinion to participate in the video, “there was no permission for the video recording where I would explain the scope and the risk of their participation in the promotion”.
The best interests of children were safeguarded
In a public session by videoconference held this Wednesday, the Superior Chamber determined, at the proposal of Judge Indalfer Infante Gonzales, that the aforementioned promotions did not violate the best interests of children.
This, because of the formats for the authorization of video recording of the semi-structured conversation and of the video recording made to the girl, it is noted that the purpose of the “Guidelines for the protection of the rights of girls, boys and adolescents in political-electoral matters”, issued by the INE, to prove the will of the mother.
In addition, Morena made a correct explanation to the minor, to find out her opinion, in simple terms, about the possible risk of using her image.
