Political leaders of the Broad Front criticized the press conference held by President Luis Lacalle Pou, this Wednesday night, in the Executive Tower.
One of the first to react was Senator Liliam Kechichian on his Twitter account. “The president raises the issue of the deadlines to adopt. That is not under discussion and we all voted on it. What is intended to repeal is to leave the fate of that child in the hands of a judge alone,” he wrote.
Another criticism of Lacalle while holding the press conference was made by the MPP deputy Sebastian Valdomir. “Years speaking ill of Maduro to end up in this” Aló Presidente “of fourth ….”, he said in his account.
From the same sector of the Broad Front, the deputy also expressed Bettiana Diaz. On his Twitter account, he exposed that the president lied when referring to adoptions.
Also from the MPP, Senator Alexander Sanchez marked an omission by the president. “He spoke of almost all the issues of the LUC. A pity that he did not refer to the chapter on fuels or to the increases in gasoline, diesel and supergas, which were implemented this year, 8 months and 14 days of application” , said.
The President spoke about almost all the topics of the LUC. It is a pity that he has not made reference to the fuel chapter or to the increases in naphtha, diesel and supergas, which were implemented this year, 8 months and 14 days of application.
– Alejandro Sánchez (@pachasanchez) March 24, 2022
For his part, Senator Mario Bergara (Force Renovadora), wrote: “There is nothing new in the President’s press conference in his defense of the No. We reaffirm: these 135 articles do not solve the problems of the people, they harm the great majorities and they appeal to old recipes already failed in the past. To multiply our efforts! #VotaSi“.
In the Uruguayan Assembly, Senator José Carlos Mahía questioned why Lacalle Pou decided to close the campaign in favor of the NP “using the institutionality of the State. In his opinion, he acted only as the president of a part of the Uruguayans. “He should have abstained and represented as Head of State to those who are with the Yes and with the No”, he said. “He was leader of the coalition, not of the State”.
The President closed the campaign in favor of NO using the State institutions.
He acted as the president of a part of the Uruguayans.
He should have abstained and represented as head of state those who are with the YES and with the NO.
He was leader of the coalition, not of the state.– José Carlos Mahía (@JoseCarlosMahia) March 24, 2022
