“What they are doing is telling the judges how they should interpret the Law. The question of the size of the world is: why didn’t they change the Law if they have everything? They have the faculty and they have the majority”, he exposed.
“We could even think that what we are facing, although I am not a constitutionalist, is an invasion of powers,” said Marván Laborde in an interview, ahead of the recall exercise to be held on April 10.
And it is that the provision establishes that the expressions of public servants (understood as declarations, diffusion and messages on social networks) in the midst of electoral processes or consultations, such as the revocation of mandate, is not government propaganda, however it remains the prohibition to use public resources.
“The fact that the Legislature makes an interpretation agreement, the truth, let’s put it mildly, does bother me. I think that something that seems to be poorly done must be reviewed there, ”estimated the political scientist.
(María Martínez/Cuartoscuro. )
