The National Fisheries Society (SNP) ruled on the decision adopted by the Supreme Court in relation to productive activities in Protected Natural Areas (ANP) due to the judicial questioning of a rule contained in a general Directive referring to larger-scale fishing.
In that sense, he welcomed that the Supreme Court put an end to the existing controversy and provided an interpretation that harmonizes the regulatory framework, specifying criteria aimed at the effective protection of conservation objectives and the development of economic activities.
The SNP indicated that from the reading of the ruling it appears that the restrictions are valid when they are aimed at avoiding the extinction of species of marine flora and fauna, and recognizes that it is possible to develop fishing activity, as long as respect for the conservation objective of the ANP is guaranteed.
“This approach, supported by scientific evidence and experiences such as that of the Nasca Dorsal National Reserve, established by Supreme Decree 008-2021MINAM, confirms that the coexistence between conservation and sustainable use is viable, strictly respecting technical criteria determined by the competent authority and adequate management,” he commented in a statement.
The National Fisheries Society reaffirmed its commitment to the conservation of the country’s natural heritage, unrestricted respect for the rule of law and compliance with current environmental regulations, as well as its permanent willingness to technical and institutional dialogue.
“The fishing industry, with more than 70 years of development in Peru, has shown that it contributes responsibly to the environmental, social and economic balance; generating employment, development and well-being for the benefit of all Peruvians,” he stressed.
RECOMMENDED VIDEO
