The Minister of Community Development of the province of Buenos Aires, Andres Larroquedenounced that there was “a mafia message” in the recent attack on the office of Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. “We must find the material authors and also the intellectual authors. You have to find out what is behind all this, ”she stated.
“There is a message in attacking Cristina”insisted the general secretary of La Cámpora, in statements to the program “La Mañana con Víctor Hugo”, which is broadcast on AM750.
During the day, the Vice President of the Nation released a new video about the attack perpetrated against her office in the National Congress, while the Chamber of Deputies debated the project of the agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
“Here they destroyed the vice president’s office – added Larroque – with all the political content it has. The Vice President is precisely a containment dam for everything that has been tragically neoliberalism and the return of the IMF in Argentina. It seemed to us that there was a political background and the government decided to avoid the issue and minimize it. I found it absolutely serious in that sense.”
The Buenos Aires official placed special emphasis on highlighting the “precision” the “operative”, remembering that “they destroyed the 4 windows and the interior of the office that correspond to Cristina’s office, but they did not affect any window of the building” of the National Congress.
Asked about the political coexistence between the members of the Frente de Todos, Larroque highlighted the need “to allow the expression of all sectors” and maintained that, in his opinion, “we are experiencing a dangerous self-prescription of a sector of the force.” “A Kirchnerist gives his opinion here and it is a drama and the unity is broken”ironized.
Finally, when referring to the project according to the IMF He reiterated that he does not share “the format” that was reached with the international organization. “They can tell you that there was no other, but what did we do the previous two years? We had a pandemic, we had an absolutely spurious loan. How was it worked? Was society called to mobilize? Was awareness raised? For me the government gave a lot of initiative in that sense”, he concluded.
