A report of Fourth Estate revealed new details about the irregular use of a congressional chamber at a Keiko Fujimori campaign event. Although the only worker sanctioned to date has been the cameraman who manipulated the equipment, at least four officials with direct or close ties to the party would have intervened behind the delivery and authorization of the material. Popular Force.
Among the names that appear in the organizational chart of responsibilities are the senior officer of Parliament, Jaime Abensur; the director of Institutional Communication, Edwin Levano; and other officials in his environment who would have participated in the chain of authorizations.
According to the Congressional Workers Unionthe case is not being investigated with due independence, since according to what they claim, there are senior personnel who have not been sanctioned or even summoned for internal proceedings.
YOU CAN SEE: “Cerpa was the one who revealed the existence of the tunnel in the Japanese residence”
Likewise, it is detailed that the institutional camera ended up recording a rally by the leader of Popular Force, a fact that was recorded in images during a partisan event. For the union, this constitutes an open misuse of public property.
According to Cuarto Poder, the Attorney’s Office has requested information and documentation about the chain of custody of the equipment, but the Communications Office would have provided incomplete reports.
In addition, the report includes the testimony of the union secretary, who questions that responsibility has fallen solely on the cameraman.
“No one goes to a political event without a superior order,” he mentioned. In this context, he assured that audiovisual tasks are assigned in a strictly hierarchical manner.
YOU CAN SEE: Dina Boluarte seeks a lifetime pension of 35,000 soles: the process began 10 days after being vacated
Meanwhile, the designated officials have not offered public explanations. Congress has also not announced an expansion of the investigation or additional administrative measures, despite the fact that images of the event confirm that a state asset ended up being used in a proselytizing act.
