The general secretary of the Unitary Union of Workers of Peru (Sutep), Lucio Castro, repudiated the actions of the congresswoman and professor, Lucinda Vasquez, who used one of his advisors to cut his toenails in full parliamentary office.
listen to the newsText converted to audio
Artificial intelligence
“(The legislator for San Martín) denigrates the image of the teacher and this confirms that Teachers with seats in Parliament are corrupt and inept and do not represent us“Castro pointed out to The Republic in reference to the congressmen of the Magisterial Caucus.
WE RECOMMEND YOU
TRAIN LAWSUIT, CANDIDATES AND SECURITY | WITHOUT SCRIPT WITH ROSA MARÍA PALACIOS
The leader pointed out that the teachers are outraged with the parliamentarians who committed themselves to defending the interests of the people and education. “They have forgotten their promises to take advantage of their condition and satisfy personal or group interests without caring about the demands,” he said.
He added that Vásquez’s questioned actions must be sanctioned with the use and respect of the Constitution, the laws and regulations of every instance or organization that exists in the country.
They ask to remove her from office
The regional secretary of Sutep for San Martín, Mauro Mitma, asked for the same thing. He demanded that Congress not shield legislator Lucinda Vásquez and proceed with removing her from the position for alleged acts of labor abuse. “The situation that involves her is shameful and scandalous and she would be engaging in practices of humiliation and abuse against her workers,” he said.
Mitma recalled that Vásquez was already investigated by the Congressional Ethics Commission; However, his case was closed. He also stated that the parliamentarian who entered for Peru Libre It has been investigated by the Public Ministry for its alleged involvement in the sale of teaching appointment exams.
Actions in the Ethics Commission
On this issue, the president of the Ethics Commission, legislator Elvis Vergara, announced that he will seek an agreement in that working group. to initiate a formal investigation against his questioned colleague. “This request will be evaluated in the next session to determine if it incurred any offenses that warrant sanction or criminal complaint for alleged misuse of State resources,” he indicated.
In his defense, through a statement, Vásquez rejected the criticism and maintained that it is an attack that aims to cause anxiety in those around him. “(This fact) has been engineered by former employees of my office that I did not allow them to take advantage of to fulfill their personal needs of a political nature,” he mentioned without showing any signs of shame.
