The former spokesperson and trusted man of the former president Dina BoluarteFredy Hinojosa, presented his resignation to the leadership of the General Office of Intergovernmental Monitoring of the Pre-Dispatchsideential, just days after the Congress approve the presidential vacancy. His departure was made official through a resolution published in the official newspaper El Peruano, marking the end of a period in which Hinojosa remained one of the figures closest to the Palace’s circle of power.
listen to the newsText converted to audio
Artificial intelligence
Hinojosa He had been appointed to the position in August of this year, after the dismissal of Juan José Santiváñez, who was also investigated for alleged irregularities. From that position, he was in charge of the coordination between the Executive and the regional and local governments, a key task for the regime’s territorial strategy.
WE RECOMMEND YOU
EVERYTHING ABOUT THE MARCH AND REBELLION IN CONGRESS | WITHOUT SCRIPT WITH ROSA MARÍA PALACIOS
The official, remembered for being the most visible voice of the government during the first months of Dina Boluarte and due to his frequent public appearances defending the management, he draws questions about his past in the Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion (Midis), where he was linked to the case. Qali Warma. The Public Ministry maintains an open investigation against him for alleged collusion and corruption in tenders for the social program.
Hinojosa, former spokesperson for Dina Boluarte, signed an act that transferred cultural heritage to the Church when he led Cofopri
According to Punto Final, in 2011, Freddy Hernán Hinojosa Angulo, then executive director of Cofopri and current spokesperson for President Dina Boluarte, signed a property title that transferred two historic temples in Juli, Puno, to the Prelature of Juli.
The temples Nuestra Señora de la Asunción and San Juan de Letrán, declared cultural heritage of the Nation and colonial architectural jewels, were registered by the Catholic Church as simple urban lots. Lawyer Ludwin Bustinza He denounced that in the document they are described as “lot D of block N”, without mentioning their historical value.
The local community questions the transfer and warns about the risks of leaving control of these sites to the Church, emphasizing that cultural heritage cannot be transferred to a private entity.
