A serious complaint of alleged influences in it Constitutional Court (TC) He has put the current minister under the magnifying glass (and at the time lawyer) Juan José Santiváñez Antunes and to the TC magistrate, Gustavo Gutiérrez Ticse. The research prepared by ‘Panamericana’ reveals the existence of an apparent link that would have been used by Santiváñez to influence the file lists and obtain favorable resolutions in The Chamber chaired by Gutiérrez Ticse. While both protagonists have flatly denied knowing or having any illicit bond, the statement of the young exasisant and the WhatsApp chats that she presented, shows a scenario that would complicate her defenses.
The alleged influence network falls on the name of Kenita Jaque de la Cruzancient and recognized assistant of Judge Gutiérrez Ticse. The most forceful probative element is a WhatsApp message that Santiváñez would have forwarded to his defendant’s family, the sentenced policeman Marcelo Outrosas (aka “the devil”), which said: “Hi Kenita, good morning, is on the list for the next audience … Marcelo’s”.
This message, according to the fiscal thesis, would prove that Santiváñez used “Kenita” as a channel to promise the acceleration of habeas corpus in the TC, a process for which he would also have requested $ 20,000 for “external advisors” with contacts within the institution.
You can see: MALAVER Minister minimizes driver murder for his nationality: “He was Venezuelan (…) has not been extortion”
The identity of contact and demarcations
The young woman Kenita Jaque de la Cruz He admitted to knowing the magistrate Gutiérrez Ticse from “many, many years” and having worked in the same room two of the TC, where the list of cases was seen. However, she has categorically rejected being the link. “I flatly rejected. If there was some type of link, it’s not me … I’ve never talked to Santiváñez … if I used my name, I would report it,” he said. For his part, the magistrate Gustavo Gutiérrez Ticse He denied any interference in his office, declaring the Prosecutor’s Office that he does not know Santiváñez or directly or indirectly.
However, the name of the magistrate is not only linked to the case of the “devil.” The document indicates that Gutiérrez Ticse was part of the Chamber that partially annulled the sentence of Eber Riquelme Juárez Moyawho saw his sentence from 22 to 16 years in prison, which would demonstrate the effectiveness of room two in which “Kenita” worked.
The case ‘the devil’ and the collection of influence
The client in question, Marcelo Outrosashe was sentenced to 27 years in prison for the crime of criminal organization. It is for this case that Santiváñez, as a lawyer, would have requested 20,000 soles for fees and, additionally, those mentioned $ 20,000 to ensure the decision in the Constitutional Court through the “advisors.” Despite promises and collection, the final sentence in the case of the “devil” was adverse: the TC declared the appeal unfounded and confirmed the 27 years in prison.
The plot was even more complex when, with the policeman out of the family, the family would have contacted Santiváñez, this time as well as Interior Ministerto demand the return of $ 20,000 and an additional favor: the improvement of his relative’s pavilion in the prison.
