The political analyst and columnist of Mission Truth, Diego Sequera, stressed that in the administration of the president of the United States, Donald Trump operates as a “kind of coalition government” with important internal contradictions between its main currents, and placed as an example the tension between the position of the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, and the most “realistic” vision represented by the special envoy of President Trump for special missions.
During an interview in the “A Pulse” program broadcast by Venezolana de Televisión (VTV), Sequera analyzed the different power wings within the Trump government and its implications in foreign policy because Rubio has tried to control all special envoys as part of a strategy to consolidate their influence and prominence in foreign policy, diplomatic, and intelligence of the United States.
He explained that these elements show two opposite approaches in the US foreign policy. UU. Towards Venezuela and other nations because Grenell seeks to generate dialogue between the two nations; While Rubio calls violence at a greater scale, with the purpose of obtaining profits that agree to the interests of the US government.
The mission columnist truth explained that, within the Trump administration, at least three important currents that generated internal conflicts, one of them could be identified; The “neoconservative warrerist Proisraelí and Neoconservador” (Neocon), a circle of power in the foreign policy of the United States that dates from before the presidency of Ronald Reagan.
Sequera explained that this circle of power in American foreign policy has a long career and its vision nourishes the notion of permanent revolution: “that is, the notion that there is an adaptation, a permanent revolution, an adaptation of constant reality, that takes it from Trotskyism directly and respect it a lot.”
In that sense, he placed Marco Rubio as a “travel companion of these circles.” He explained that his position is crucial due to his political interests and bases in Florida and Israel, seeking the base of the Republican party.
The analyst stressed that Rubio is not consistent with the current that was favored during the campaign of President Trump and that he has similarity with figures such as Richard Grenelll, Tucker Carlson and the Bridge Colby, this group as more “realistic” and that considers that the “permanent war undergoes the America First and the restitution of the United States.”
He mentioned that this current, “that favors conservative positions in the classical and right -wing sense,” seeks the internal reconstruction of a very affected society. He argued that the war is counterproductive, since “neither politically nor politically serves the United States.”
“That is a bit of someone’s position like, like Grenell,” Sequera said, adding that the president’s envoy for special missions is close to important opinioners who represent a “dissident voice of weight” in the United States with “tangible.”
VTV/lav/db/
