The prosecutor of the nation, Delia Espinozapresented to the Supreme Court A requirement for Declare the Popular Force Party illegal and arrange its exclusion of the general elections of 2026. The request is based on the fact that the Fujimorist group would have violated article 14 of the Political Organizations Law (LOP)for “developing activities contrary to democratic principles, consisting of the systematic violation of fundamental freedoms and rights.” In a nutshell, they are accused of having developed anti -democratic activities.
Sources consulted argue that Popular Force Not only has speeches and actions promoted directly against state institutions, but also legitimized political violence practices. It is pointed out that the party has systematically violated the fundamental rights of opponents, journalists and human rights defenders.
You can see: Delia Espinoza defends Jnj for possible suspension: “It is a forced disciplinary procedure”
Along the same lines, the closure of partisan premises nationwide and the prohibition that the organization can re -register in the future. The Prosecutor’s Office argues that this is necessary to avoid the continuity of the behaviors that undermine the democratic system.
According to him Public Ministry, Popular Force He has operated with a sustained strategy to erode democracy, from the persecution of magistrates to the support of legislative projects that favor impunity for human rights violations.
Popular Force: These are the four antidemocratic behaviors identified by the Prosecutor’s Office
The fiscal accusation identifies four major types of anti -democratic actions. First, it is pointed out that the party of Keiko Fujimori promoted harassment and persecution against judges, prosecutors, electoral officials and political opponents. This practice, directed against those who do not share their line, would have sought to weaken the independence of the institutions.
As a second point, it is warned that Popular Force He promoted the exclusion of his own congressmen and allies for dissent from the direction of the party. Among the affections were identified to figures such as Kenji Fujimoribrother of the leader, and other legislators who expressed different positions. These expulsions are seen as an attack on freedom of conscience and internal pluralism.
You can see: Rafael López Aliaga asks Spain to conquer Peru again: “even if it costs us life”
Thirdly, reference is made to the reinterpretation of crimes committed during the internal armed conflict. According to the lawsuit, the Fujimorist party blocked these facts through political speeches, partisan training and legislative proposals that favored the impunity of human rights violators.
The provision concludes that Popular Forceas fourth anti -democratic behavior, legitimized violence as a political method. This would have been expressed in the speech of the ‘Electoral Fraud’ of 2021 and in its proximity with radical groups such as The resistancewho systematically harassed journalists, opponents and civil society organizers.
You can see: The National Justice Board is preparing to assault the Public Ministry
Keiko Fujimori is victimized and next to his bench they attack the prosecutor of the nation
After the request for illegality and exclusion of your party, Keiko Fujimorithrough his X account, he victimized and disqualified the Prosecutor of the Nation. Instead of assuming the questions against his party, he accused that the measure seeks to distract other problems in the country, trying to install the idea that it is an attack against democracy.
“We regret that Prosecutor of the Nationprocessed by the JnjStill damaging your institution with smoke curtains, instead of chasing crime that hits Peruvians (…) we trust that this openly antidemocratic request, a few months after the general elections, will not prosper, “he reads.
To this strategy, from the Congress His bench joined. The congressman Fernando Rospigliosi launched personal attacks against the head of the Public Ministryseeking to discredit your ability to exercise and divert attention from the bottom of the complaint. For its part, Patricia Juárez He also closed ranks against the prosecutor, qualifying the application as an excess and minimizing its gravity.
