Result of the opening of packages, counting votes cancellation of two boxes and review of the direction of 478 doubtful votes cast in the election held in the municipality of Poza Rica, the magistrates determined that the flag bearer Janeth Adanely Rodríguez, of the Morenista alliance, remained with 519 suffrages more than the emecist Emilio Olvera Andrade, who in the computation The lead.
For that reason, the triumph was accredited to Morena and Green, coalition in favor of which Judge Tania Celina Vásquez proposed to issue the majority and validity record of the election. The decision was backed by the three Magistrates of the TEV.
Although the rule establishes that it must be convened 24 hours in advance, the governor of Veracruz has given the instruction that today (on a holiday) session the Veracruz Electoral Tribunal.
They want to steal the choice of Poza Rica and Papantla and alter people’s vote. pic.twitter.com/jy35fceq1l
– Jorge Álvarez Máynez (@alvarezmaynez)
SEPTEMBER 16, 2025
In the case of the municipality of Papantla, Veracruz, unanimously of the magistrates, the Green Morena-Partyan Alliance (PVEM) and its candidate Gonzalo Flores were proven, by declaring the challenge made by the Citizen Movement, in which he alleged alleged irregularities occurred during the vote counting.
The speaker magistrate, Gilberto Constituent Salazar, argued that there was a campaign on social networks to induce the sentence with political interests, but assured that the alleged anomalies denounced by the orange party and its flag bearer Mariano Romero were not proven.
The electoral packages had to move to Jalapa, Veracruz, where the count was completed and, according to MC, there appeared tickets that had originally been marked by MC and then they were manipulated maliciously to be void (they would have been marked by other matches, which were not valid), so they changed the results to favor Morena, according to the emecists.
But according to the constituent magistrate, “the elections are won with votes and in the case of the means of challenge these are won with evidence.”
In this case, what is evidence is that there was a change of winner during the vote count and MC did not present elements of “time, mode and place where what happened happened (the manipulation of votes). In such a way that they constitute a conjecture.”
He explained that the facts analyzing the magistrates are those that reflect the evidence.
“The one who states is obliged to prove” and MC did not prove his sayings, so “we are facing a case of insufficiency of evidence” and here “it was not even tested indicated.”
In his presentation, he said that the documentary records are full evidence and these indicate that the morenista obtained more votes, while, he said, the evidence presented by MC was technical evidence, which consists of photographs and videos, and that type of elements do not have an probative value assigned by law and only have value if the judge considers it.
But such tests “can be made with relative ease, more now, with the assault of artificial intelligences”, so they may seem real, without being.
In the session other electoral results were confirmed. The emecista Lorenzo Efraín Marín Delfín in the municipality of Fortín de las Flores, that of the Labor Party (PT) in Jalagingo, (where the winner went to Morena) and that of Tierra Blanca, the latter that had also been challenged by MC.
The magistrates gave the triumph to the PVEM in Misantla and in Ilamatlán, the latter had won the PT but lost it in court.
