Through a Live of Tik Tok with more than 26 thousand connected in real time, Former President Martín Vizcarra recalled passages from his stay in the prison of Barbadillo, in which he briefly shared seclusion with other ex -presidents. The former head of state said that with Alejandro Toledo “He hardly spoke,” but he did have time to talk with Pedro Castillo, whom he defined as a simple person.
“With Toledo I hardly talked. With whom I had time to talk, it was with Pedro Castillo. Good Campeche, Belomón, I had details. When I just arrived, I had details, that a fruitful invites you. Regardless of whether I have done a good or bad government, but the person who is, how you treat people,” he said.
In addition, he said what he felt when he heard that the judge accepted the fiscal requirement and said that his arguments or those of his lawyer did not interest the judge. “The judge already had a sentence made. The judge did not listen to me or my lawyer. It leads to a situation that I can assimilate, but that affects the closest people,” he said.
It should be remembered that the last September 4, Martín Vizcarra He regained his freedom after the order of release by the Judiciary. The ex -president had an order of 5 months of preventive detention against him for investigations in cases Lomas de Ilo and Moquegua Hospital When he was regional governor.
“What is coming now is to continue collaborating with justice, as I have always done, I will be attending all the citations of the Judiciary, as I have always done and the judge has declared it. (…) I will remain in the country, I have no impediment of exit, and I will be in the country. I am not going to escape, I am not going to be aslar, because I have respect for those who trust me and the Peruvian system, it is my word of honor.
Martín Vizcarra: What was the reason to cancel the preventive detention against him?
The Third National Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court He revoked the preventive detention against the head of state, Martín Vizcarra, at the end that the arguments of the Public Ministry were not enough. According to the resolution, prosecutors did not demonstrate relevant variations in the family roots of the ex -president or presented new evidence that support the requested measure.
In addition, the court observed that the elements exposed by the Prosecutor had already been reviewed above and did not provide new evidence.
The Public Ministry had pointed out that Vizcarra’s youngest son appeared with a different direction in his ID, which, in his opinion, evidenced lack of family roots. However, the magistrates rejected this approach and recalled that, during a search carried out last March 2024, the former president was in his home with his wife and son.
Also, they stressed that Vizcarra maintains labor roots through its link with the Urbaniza 3D company, backed in documents such as titles, reports, payment vouchers and affidavits.
Regarding contracts between Peru First and Vizcarra, The judges warned that some payments were made after the request for preventive detention, although they confirmed that there is work activity through the aforementioned company.
