The ruling of federal judge Edward Chen occurs after in July migrant organizations introduced a law
Federal District Judge Edward Chen annulled the decision of the United States Department of Security (DHS) to eliminate the Temporary Protection Statute (TPS) for Venezuelans and Haitians.
This Friday, September 5, the judicial ruling that gives legal status to more than 500 thousand Venezuelans that benefit from this immigration program from 2021 and 2023 was announced.
The decision is known the same day that the DHS asked Venezuelans with the 2021 TPS Take your forecasts to leave US soil Before November of this year by formalizing the end of the program that was created during the management of Democrat Joe Biden.
«For 35 years the TPS Statute has been faithfully applied by presidential administrations of both parties […] With the consultation and participation of the State Department and other agencies, in processes that imply care and careful reviews, ”said the judge in his ruling, picked up the chain Telemundo.
The ruling occurs after in July, migrant defenders introduced a demand in favor of the TPS beneficiaries, who rejected the allegations of the National Security Department that the conditions both in Venezuela and in Haiti had improved, which made this benefit unfeasible.
Judge Chen argued that the secretary of the DHS, Kristi Noem, “violated the law” by eliminating the statute and the speed in which he announced it, as well as the short period to look for the beneficiaries of legal alternatives to be in the US.
The ads occur in the middle of the escalation between Caracas and Washington due to the large -scale military deployment of the US in the Caribbean Sea, near the coast of Venezuela, in what the White House alleges as an operation against drug trafficking, while Miraflores considers it an attempt by the US government to cause “a regime change” in Venezuela.
With information from Telemundo
*Journalism in Venezuela is exercised in a hostile environment for the press with dozens of legal instruments arranged for the punishment of the word, especially the laws “against hatred”, “against fascism” and “against blockade.” This content was written taking into consideration the threats and limits that, consequently, have been imposed on the dissemination of information from within the country.
Post views: 416
