The journalist Juliana Oxenford rejected, during her program Arde Troya, the promulgation of the Amnesty Law And he regretted that prosecuted are expected to this rule to be free from accusations for attempting against human rights.
Listen to the newsText turned into audio
Artificial intelligence
“These people are never going to pay for the innocent people they murdered, who disappeared, to the women who raped the children who attacked. Those who are imprisoned want to free them those who are in process forget, they will be free of any accusation. What precedent is left,” he said.
Prosecuted already ask to take advantage of amnesty law
In May 1988 A total of 37 peasants in the Cayara district (Ayacucho) They were killed. It is presumed that these were extrajudicial executions of the army. More than three decades later the relatives of the victims are still waiting for justice. To this is added that eight of the military processed by this case could be free of any guilt, hosting the amnesty law promulgated by the Dina Boluarte government. The orders were presented by: Alejandro Avendaño, Gino Espejo Lamas, Julián Joaquín Solórzano, José Valdivia Dueñas, Max Vargas Caquipoma, Juan Moreno Rodríguez, Justo Jeshua Alonso and Guillermo Gutiérrez Falconi. The Sixth Superior Criminal Chamber announced that it will not pronounce on each order until the sentence.
These are former MiMitaries Gino Espejo Lamas and Alejandro Avendaño Dávila, whose defenses have submitted a trade to the Judicial Branch to take advantage of Law No. 32419, popularly known as Amnesty Lawwhich exonerates military, police and members of the self -defense committees processed by crimes against human rights committed during the internal armed conflict between 1980 and 2000.
To these written petitions orally, those of six other processed in the same direction during an oral trial hearing of the case of August 18 were added orally. These were presented by the lawyers of Julián Joaquín Solórzano (currently in prison), José Valdivia Dueñas (Military Political Chief of Ayacucho in 1988), while the public defense of the remaining four, who were absent, also added to the application.
In the private hearing “the majority (of the defendants of the defendants) argued that the law is binding on the room, so there would be no possibility of doing any conventionality control and should be granted once,” he told the Republic Gloria Cano, responsible for the legal area of the Human Rights Association (APRODEH).
He also said that the Defense of former general Valdivia Dueñascontumaz fugitive in justice, argued that his client is not in hiding but “is guided.” Also, they said that the right to truth would not be violated, as it is already pointed out by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (CVR) and that it is an 89 -year -old person.
