The Court will determine whether or not the capture of Palomino is necessary, although it went without interruption to the entire process.
Bogotá Metropolitan Police Command Transmission Ceremony assumes General José Daniel Gualdrón.
The Supreme Court of Justice issued a sense of condemnatory against the former director of the National Police, General (R) Rodolfo Palomino Bautista López, After having found it guilty of the crime of traffic of public servant influences, having unduly used his position to avoid the capture of the businessman, Luis Gonzalo Gallo Restrepo in 2014.
He decided from the high court was taken in the first instance and that This Thursday, August 14, the sentence will be read which could range between five and twelve years in prison.
It may interest you: Fabio Martínez, former -fiscal, receives a definitive preview for prevaricate according to the Supreme Court ruling
Loading …
According to the accusation of the Attorney General’s Office, on February 8, 2014, General Rodolfo Palomino went with the then director of Dijín, Major Jorge Enrique Rodríguez Peraltato the residence of the prosecutor Sonia Lucero Velásquez, to ask the prosecutor to suspend the arrest warrant against the renowned businessman Luis Gonzalo Gallo Restrepo, who was investigated for an alleged relationship with paramilitaries in events related to landfill in the land in the nineties in the Tulapas area, (Córdoba).
In this meeting, which was apparently recorded by prosecutor Velásquez, The officer invoked the social importance that the employer had and his links with senior leaders with senior dignitaries of the State as the former president, Andrés Pastrana and the president of the World Bank, to justify his intervention.
According to the Supreme Court of Justice, the Prosecutor Sonia Lucero Velázquez reported in the oral trial how she was contacted and subsequently visited by General Rodolfo Palomino, in a context that she perceived as irregular andmotivating her to record the conversation they held on February 8, 2014 at her residence.
More information: Miguel Uribe’s family lawyer asks that his crime be declared against humanity: “He was not committed in isolation”
“Its action constitutes a serious affectation to the legal good of the public administration given the improper use of the power conferred by its position, which is why it also attributes the circumstance of greater punishability enshrined in article 58 numeral 9 of the Criminal Code, for having acted from a distinguished position in society,” says one of the sections of the document of the meaning of the ruling, issued by the Supreme Court of Justice.
Source: Integrated information system
