AND
l rebumbio Media has been formidable. Not only the opinion has fully entered the condemnation and clerk. An endless columnists and speakers, with less or medium thrust, has uploaded voices and letters to the podium. The intense pounding has bound, advice and morality wholesale. The exhibitions of apparent, stoned or real uses of luxuries, in charge of characters of the ruling party, are shown tirelessly by the opposition, either in favor or ideological. Even President has decided to mediate in the debate. Without pointing out offenders or condemning excesses of their government or party. Rather, it underlines decency routes, attachment to discrete norms and moderate behavior forms. The fair Juarista media was the motto accepted for the woman or the public man. But his position and opinion has been clouded by the brawl, without any consideration. The contradictions between the innovative partisan preaching and the apparent or real transgressions have prevailed in the public theater. The old Roman slogan is now valid: César’s woman should not only be honest, but also seem it.
The history documes, widely, the displays and exhibitions without shame, in the case of wealth or power. Whether men or women who have been patched, with questioned, for their personal waste, use inappropriate scenarios or media and bizarre bursts whose costs exceed demanding normality. Numerous magazines circulate throughout the world, flaunting possessions and customs in search of acceptance, even if elusive. Samples of jewelry, palaces, trips, vehicles or runaway parties appear in the face of envy and courts of readers, avids of imitation. Even national newspapers, citing, compulsively, everyday transgressors of the ruling party, it slips, at the same time, sending, as this subscribers, thick annexes praising the characters of the show, citing baptisms of wealthy, exclusive meetings of rich and notable or unique presences of some “chosen”. Little would have to be added to the planetary aristocracies, presented as epitomes of decency, envied heritage or the norm of good walk, live and drink.
The world is certainly a witness of flagrant contradictions between deficiencies or needs, against the insulting sanctified abundance. And not only are the samples of rescued extravagances, converted into forced reference reference to imitate. The call to resist, such temptations, with the single word or voluntary intention, also appears. The deployment of golden intimacies of attractive characters of “high elites” or simple showing seems unstoppable and public. Difficult task to contain or submit to those who are weak norms of line and austere behavior. Surrounding, or behind the open deployment of wealth, polula a vanity in urgent search for affirmation and belonging.
The conservative opposition believes having found the argumentative mine to undermine the current government or its Morena party. He has valued, valuely, vacation abroad, with him, supposedly irrebatible, argument of flagrant contradictions between doing and saying. Show, before the eyes of the electorate or wealthy middle class, which is not possible to imitate it by climbers of the left puritana. There are not only double morals in these allegations, but an overflowing class. Luxury, almost preach as axioma, is exclusively “ours.” Only the richness of origin and private uses is acceptable, according to this trick thought. Only our rich can stay in good hotels. You, media officials, are excluded from the banquet. If they dare to approach this practice they will be thrown into purgatory and discredit.
There is really an obligation to say that there is no excuse for abusive or frank thieves of the public. They must even be taken before the law. The minimal suspicion of impunity is hurtful, even degrading. Nor do you stay in a good hotel (there are promotions) is evil testing. But they cannot be excepted purchase and use of very expensive watches and jewels of great value or residences that exceed annual or six -year wages of officials or partisan militants.
The many years, certainly decades, in which the PRI managed to reduce inequalities, do not apologize for the exaggerated patrimonialism of many others that benefited in excess. Nor are the PAN are left out of punishable and not punished offenses. Provide conditioned legislative law services to hide fantastic public resources deviations in voracious benefit of their sponsors: bankers and entrepreneurs gandallas. The above remains as evidence of its degrading double discourse and moral. The correspondence between such speech and the citizen vote is pending for upcoming elections and support.
