The journalist Gustavo Gorriti He ruled on the special commission of the Congress created to investigate the agreements between the State and the Brazilian company Odebrecht, which is chaired By parliamentarian Alejandro Muñante and various members of the Popular Force bench, creating an obvious conflict of interest.
“It is the search for impunity,” he said Gorriti In the ‘political brutality’ program, adding that the creation of this parliamentary commission joins a set of maneuvers: “They have put their own people in the Prosecutor’s Officethe National Justice Board has changed, they have a town defender, they have a TC appointed by them, they have changed the rules. ”
I add that the purpose of taking the power of state institutions is to change the already known narrative, where the political figures accepted by Odebrecht’s bribes in exchange for tenders (Lava Jato case) are known. “All these rascals that were brought to light by cases of corruption and because of the way they tried to hide the received, they have the idea that in the end they end up as victims being claimed, and the prosecutors and journalists who did the investigation thoroughly end up being punished as guilty of imaginary crimes of disinformation,” Gorriti said.
He supports his hypothesis indicating that this would be achieved by leguleyadas, the control of the media, the testimony of prostituted witnesses, would reach a situation similar to what happened in Guatemala, where the main judges and anti -corruption prosecutors went to jail or had to go into exile or journalists like José Rubén Zamora are, to date, in jail.
“That is the scenario that they want to achieve through the massive use of misinformation and having commissions such as Muñante where they have people who are discovered in the case that will try to fix everything and completely change the narrative. That would be the triumph of the corrupt through misinformation and capture of power,” he emphasized.
Fiscal Research against Gustavo Gorriti
The journalist also referred to the fiscal investigation that was opened to him together with the prosecutors José Domingo Pérez and Rafael Vela, after the testimony of Jaime Villanueva. “They investigated me because supposedly Sunday and candle gave me good information in exchange for me to get praise things about them. In other words they were criminalizing the exercise of journalism,” he said.
He also said that the investigation had erroneous data and did not consider the advanced knowledge that IdL reporters had on the first stage of the Lava Jato case, much deeper than the Prosecutor’s Office.
