The Executive, through Foreign Minister Elmer Schialer, announced the creation of a working group that will analyze the Peruwith the intention of evaluating an eventual output “as quickly as possible.”
“We are working for a forced march to establish this commission. Not only will the Ministry of Justice and the Foreign Ministry participate, but also social, civil and academic actors,” the minister told the press.
He also indicated that he will consult with experts in the field. “The idea is to consult everyone. A unilateral decision will not be made,” he said.
Dina Boluarte opposes the Court IDH
After Inter -American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) Criticize the Amnesty Law driven from the Constitution Commission congressionalled by Fernando Rospigliosi; pointing out that it favors the impunity of members of the Armed forces and the Police sentenced for crimes against humanity, Dina Boluarte He went out to defend the project and assured that he will not take into account the observations made by the international legal body.
“From that December 7, 2022, the defense of the Peruvian State and society against those who declared war will always have our support. (…) Peru is free and independent, with autonomous sovereignty. (…) We will not allow the intervention of the IACHR, which aims to suspend a bill that seeks justice for the members of our members of our Armed forcesthe National Police and the self -defense committees that fought, risking their life, against the insanity of terrorism. (…) We will not allow it, “said the president.
It is not the first time that BOLUARTE GOVERNMENT confronts the most interpretation of human rights in the region. On previous occasions, through Ministry of Justicethe executive had already expressed his disagreement with the observations made by the IACHR.
On that occasion, the Ministry affirmed that its position was backed by the principle of sovereignty: “The Peruvian State expresses its energetic rejection of the repeated provisions of the Court that contravene international law, since they do not detach themselves from the American Convention on Human Rights. (…) The Court cannot replace national authorities or impose actions on a matter that has not been known in internal headquarters, affecting not only the sovereignty of Peru, but weakening the system itself, “reads the pronouncement.
