He Lima Bar Association (Cal) He announced that he will take the case of the disciplinary process initiated by the National Board of Justice (JNJ) Against the president of the Judiciary, Dr. Janet Tello Gilardibefore the Inter -American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR). This decision was announced during a meeting held on February 17, at the Palace of Justice, where the Dean of Cal, Raúl Canelo Rabanal, and other managers expressed concern about what they consider an attack on judicial autonomy.
During the meeting, the CAL expressed its rejection of the disciplinary process, in which it argued that this affects fundamental principles of the rule of law, such as judicial independence, due process and division of powers. “This act threatens the autonomy of the judges and the proper functioning of the judicial system,” said Canelo Rabanal, who called for reflection on the seriousness of the situation.
Dr. Janet Tello thanked the support of lime, where he highlighted the importance of his pronouncements in defense of justice and the rule of law. “After many years, lime has made its voice feel and returns hope to the legal community and the general population,” he said.
At the meeting, the Dean of the CAL also requested the evaluation of unrestricted attention to the lawyers for a certain time, with the aim of guaranteeing better access to justice and responding to the clamor of the members of the order. In addition, the possibility of signing specific agreements related to the exercise of lawyers, professional ethics and transparency was discussed.
You can see: Juan José Santiváñez seeks to corner Delia Espinoza from Congress and Jnj
Another relevant issue addressed was the reactivation of meetings between magistrates and litigating lawyers, which were held before the Covid-19 pandemic, in order to strengthen communication and collaboration between both institutions. Likewise, the creation of a Peruvian jurisprudence observatory and the importance of promoting the Continuous training of law professionals.
Jnj faces a constitutional infraction by process against Janet Tello
The National Board of Justice (JNJ) could be committing a constitutional violation when initiating an urgent disciplinary procedure against the president of the Judiciary, Janet Telloas indicated by his lawyer, Luciano López, to RPP.
According to the lawyer, the JNJ lacks the authority to initiate a procedure in a case that is still pending, like that of Retiro Colonel Julio Ramón Cadenillas Díaz, who presented an amparo action against the resolution that is the object of the immediate process. This action turned out that the authorities concluded that their rights had not been violated.
“He currently has an unfavorable sentence in the first instance, where the same fact says: ‘No, here there is no problem with a repealed norm, here there is no problem with motivation,’ and this man has appealed,” said the lawyer.
President of the Judiciary, Janet Tello, on the JNJ process against him: “I do not feel threatened”
On February 16, the president of the Judicial BranchJanet Tello, declared that “he does not feel threatened” by the decision of the National Justice Board to initiate an urgent disciplinary procedure against him, arguing that the institution does not have the authority to do so and that the case that is questioned does not justifies a wingspan process (where the most severe sanction is dismissal).
You can see: Wilson Soto defends buffet of S/1.6 million from Congress: “Sometimes I bring lunch of my house”
“I receive it with a lot of surprise because the express processes are precisely for those cases of serious behaviors, for example, if a judge is intervened in an act of corruption. It cannot be that there is an immediate process to question a jurisdictional criterion about Which the JNJ has no competition, “he said in an interview about to point.
Follow the Republic at WhatsApp! Do not forget to join from your mobile device to our channel in that messaging network to continue informed of the national and international events.
