Today: February 8, 2025
February 8, 2025
1 min read

AGU calls on the judgment on the accountability of networks

AGU appeals to annul suspension of disclosure of CNU block 4

The Attorney General of the Union (AGU) requested this Friday (7) from the Supreme Federal Court (STF) speed in the resumption of trial on the accountability of social networks for illegal content posted by users.AGU calls on the judgment on the accountability of networks

The trial was suspended in December last year after a request for a view of Minister André Mendonça. The date for resumption has not yet been marked.

In the petition sent to the Supreme Court, the AGU states that the theme should be treated as a priority against the announcement of the goal (Instagram controller, Facebook and WhatsApp) of new rules that can make the fight against hate speeches flexible.

For the agency, the new model of the terms of use of the platforms allows the dissemination of messages with racist, xenophobic, misogynistic and homophobic content.

“Changes promoted by the applicant in his terms of use, notably as to the greater permissiveness for hatred discourse against vulnerable groups, violates the set of grounds and solutions so far outlined by this supreme cut for the dismissal of constitutional controversy in relation to criminal practices “argues the AGU.

AGU also asked the Supreme Court to join the document that brings together the contributions received by the agency During the public hearing held in January this year to discuss the protection of fundamental rights in social networks.

Understand

The plenary of the Supreme Court judges two processes that discuss the constitutionality of article 19 of the Civil Marco of the Internet.

In the lawsuit reported by Minister Dias Toffoli, the Court discusses the validity of the rule that requires prior court order to hold the providers accountable for illicit acts. The case deals with a Facebook appeal to overthrow court decision that condemned the platform for moral damages by creating a user’s false profile.

In the process reported by Minister Luiz Fux, the Supreme Court judges if a company that hosts a site on the Internet must oversee offensive content and remove them from the air without judicial intervention. The feature was filed by Google.

To date, three votes have been delivered at the trial.

Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

A dead and three captured leave fighting with the ELN in the Catatumbo
Previous Story

A dead and three captured leave fighting with the ELN in the Catatumbo

President: We are building the new popular government system
Next Story

President: We are building the new popular government system

Latest from Blog

Learn how the UN Human Rights Council

Learn how the UN Human Rights Council

Rejected by the United States and Israel, who recently announced his departure from the agency, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) completes this year 19 years of existence. The forum was
Go toTop